SILC logo; click to go back to the homepage
Spatial Intelligence and Learning Center — Bibliography
NSF Science of Learning Center
 

Welcome to the SILC Bibliography!

While the "Publications" section of the SILC website contains only those publications written by the various SILC members, this bibliography contains publications by both SILC members and Spatial Network members as well as those publications that were found to be useful in our research.

In addition to the search box at the top of the Bibliography page, another useful tool for searching through the citations is your web browser's search facility (usually ctrl-F).

This site is powered by Aigaion - A PHP/Web based management system for shared and annotated bibliographies. For more information visit www.aigaion.nl.

All publications sorted by author (1456 publications, 2038 authors)

A

Adams, R., Flannery, K. A., Finn, P., & Hamilton, D. (2003, March). A virtual reality pilot study: Assessment of memory and vigilance with a virtual radial arm maze. Poster presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore, MD.
Adams, R., White, J., Flannery, K. A., & Finn, P. (2004, April). A virtual reality maze pilot study: Cross-sectional investigation of age by task complexity. Poster presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
Agogino, A. M. & Linn, M. C. (1992). Retaining female engineering students: Will early design experiences help? [Viewpoint Editorial]. In M. Wilson (Ed.), National Science Foundation Directions: 5 (2) (pp. 8-9). National Science Foundation.
Ahmed, A., Chandrasekera, T., & Yang, C. (2010, April). The Effect of Spatial Knowledge on Sense of Belonging in University Environments. The 2011 Annual Architectural Research Centers Consortium Spring Research Conference, Detroit, Michigan. Accepted Abstract.
Ainsworth, S. E. (1999). A functional taxonomy of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33(2/3), 131-152.
Ainsworth, S. E. & Van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241-255.
Akar, E., Tunçer, B., Attema, J., & Stouffs, R. (2003). Design and evaluation of a collaborative virtual space: InfoBase. In B. Tunçer, S. S. Ozsariyildiz, & S. Sariyildiz (Eds.), E-Activities in Design and Design Education (pp. 3-12). Paris:
Allen, E. C., Beilock, S. L., & Shevell, S. K. (2011). Working memory is related to perceptual processing: A case from color perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 37(4), 1014-1021.
[DOI]
Amorapanth, P. X., Widick, P., & Chatterjee, A. (2010). The neural basis for spatial relations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1739-1753.
[DOI]
Andonova, E., Tenbrink, T., & Coventry, K. R. (2008). Spatial description, function and context. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 199-204). Austin, Texas: Cognitive Science Society.
Aron, A. R., Fletcher, P. C., Bullmore, E. T., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2003). Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 6(2), 115-116.
  • []: Some information was erroneously left out of the article. Erratum corrected in later publication. The DOI for that is 10.1038/nn1203-1329a
    : In the version of this article initially published online, the legend to Supplementary Figure 1 was omitted. The legend has now been appended to the online supplementary figure. Supplementary Figure 1 Data from left frontal patients. Correlations between stop signal reaction times (SSRT, ms) and the volume of damage to each region (SFG, IFG, MFG, ORB and MED, cm3) for each patient. SSRT for left frontal patients was 194 plusminus 44.1 ms, indicating intact response inhibition overall; confirmed by the fact that SSRT was significantly faster than for right frontals (t = 2.2, P < 0.05). SSRT was not significantly positively correlated with damage to any of: SFG (n = 15, r = 0.1, n.s.), MFG (r = -0.47, n.s.), IFG (r = -0.58, P = 0.023), ORB (P = 0.3, n.s.) and MED (r = 0.3, n.s.).

[DOI]
Ashcraft, M. H. & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(2), 243-248.
Ashley, A. & Carlson, L. A. (2007). Encoding direction when interpreting proximal terms. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(7).
[DOI]
[URL]

B

Bai, X. & Latecki, L. J. (2008). Path Similarity Skeleton Graph Matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 30(7).
[DOI]
Balcomb, F., Newcombe, N. S., & Ferrara, K. (2009). Convergence and divergence in representational systems: Place learning and language in toddlers. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Cognitive Science, 2009: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Societ (pp. 596-601): Cognitive Science Society.
Bamps, D. & Claeys, A. (2009). Are we always in control of the passion? Aha wetenstappen Leuven. Tourism Leuven – Association Catholic University of Leuven.
Bamps, D. (2009). Jeremy Bentham: A critical approach. In J. Peeters (Ed.), Ethics and Society (pp. 23-25). Leuven: Leuven University College, Dep. Social School.
Bamps, D. & Roels, R. (2009). Visualization of a beautiful mind, mathematical eye-openers of moral behaviour and related (hidden) consequences. Proceedings of the Gordon Research Conferences: Visualization in science & education. United Kingdom: Magdalen College Oxford.
T. Barkowsky, S. Bertel, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.). (2010). Cognitive Shape Processing. Cognitive Shape Processing: Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium: AAAI Press.
Barkowsky, T. & Freksa, C. (1997). Cognitive requirements on making and interpreting maps. In S. C. Hirtle & A. Frank (Eds.), Spatial information theory: LNAI 1329 LNAI 1329 (pp. 347-361). Berlin: Springer.
T. Barkowsky, C. Freksa, & M. Knauff (Eds.). (2005). Special Issue Spatial and visual components in mental reasoning about space. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(2/3), 115-269.
T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat, & D. R. Montello (Eds.). (2007). Spatial Cognition V: Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Spatial Cognition V: Reasoning, Action, Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4387 . Berlin: Springer.
Barkowsky, T. (2007). Modeling mental spatial knowledge processing: An AI perspective. In F. W. Mast & L. Jaencke (Eds.), Spatial processing in navigation, imagery, and perception (pp. 67-84). Springer, New York.
Barth, H., Baron, A., Spelke, E., & Carey, S. (2009). Children's multiplicative transformations of discrete and continuous quantities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(4), 441-454.
Basso, D. (2008). Spatial navigation. Cognitive Processing, 9(4), 227-228.
[DOI]
Basso, D. (2008). Spatial perception and knowledge. Cognitive Processing, 9(2), 81-82.
[DOI]
Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for research in mathematics education, 21(1), 47-60.
[DOI]
Becker, S. & Burgess, N. (2001). Modelling spatial recall, mental imagery and neglect. In T. K. Leen, T. G. Dietterich, & V. Tresp (Eds.), Advances in Neural Processing Systems 13 (pp. 96-102). MIT Press.
Beilock, S. L. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesture changes thought by grounding it in action. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1605-1610.
[DOI]
[URL]
Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers' math anxiety affects girls' math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 107 (pp. 1860-1863).
[DOI]
[URL]
Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Reply to Plante et al.: Girls' math achievements is related to their female teachers' math anxiety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 107(20), E80.
[DOI]
[URL]
Beilock, S. L. & Hohmann, T. (2010). Embodied cognition “Ein Ansatz für die Sportpsychologie”. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 17(4), 120-129.
[DOI]
Beilock, S. L. & Ramirez, G. (2011). On the interplay between emotion and cognitive control: Implications for enhancing academic achievement. In J. Mestre & B. Ross (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, chapter 5: 55 (pp. 137-169). Elsevier.
[DOI]
Benice, T. S. & Raber, J. (2009). Dihydrotestosterone modulates spatial working memory in male mice. Journal of Neurochemistry, 110(3), 902-911.
Bertel, S. (2007). Towards attention-guided human-computer collaborative reasoning for spatial configuration and design. Foundations of Augmented Cognition, 4565 (pp. 337-345): Springer.
[DOI]
Bertel, S., Barkowsky, T., & Freksa, C. (2008). Mental model-centered design for built environments. In S. Haq, C. Hoelscher, & S. Torgrude (Eds.), Proc. of EDRAMOVE workshop on "Movement and orientation in built environments: evaluating design rationale and user cognition" (pp. 13-19). EDRA 39th Annual Conference, SFB/TR 8 Report No. 015-05/2008.
Bertel, S., Sima, J. F., & Lindner, M. (2009). Scalable Representation Structures for Visuo-Spatial Reasoning - Dynamic Explorations into Knowledge Types. Multi-representational Architectures for Human-level Intelligence: Papers from the 2009 AAAI Fall Symposium, FS-09-05 (pp. 2-7): AAAI Press.
[URL]
Bertel, S., Vrachliotis, G., & Freksa, C. (2007). Aspect-oriented building design: Towards computer-aided approaches to solving spatial constraints in architecture. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Applied Spatial Cognition: From Research to Cognitive Technology (pp. 75-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bhatt, M. (2010). Commonsense Inference in Dynamic Spatial Systems: Epistemological Requirements. 23rd International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2010) - Special Track on Spatio-Temporal Reasoning: AAAI Press.
Bhatt, M. (2009). Commonsense Inference in Dynamic Spatial Systems: Phenomenal and Reasoning Requirements. In I. Bratko & J. Žabkar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning (QR 09) (pp. 1-6).
Bhatt, M. & Freksa, C. (2010). Spatial Computing for Design: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective. US NSF International Workshop on Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity SDC'10.
Bhatt, M. (2010). Reasoning about Space, Actions and Change: A Paradigm for Applications of Spatial Reasoning. In S. Hazarika (Ed.), Qualitative Spatio-Temporal Representation and Reasoning: Trends and Future Directions. PA: IGI Global.
Bhatt, M. & Loke, S (2008). Modelling Dynamic Spatial Systems in the Situation Calculus. Journal of Spatial Cognition and Computation: Special Issue on Spatio-Temporal Reasoning, 8(1), 86-130.
[DOI]
Blasko, D., Holliday-Darr, K., Mace, D., & Blasko-Drabik, H. (2004). VIZ: The visualization assessment and training website. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 36(2), 256-260.
Bobek, E. J. & Corter, J. E. (2010). Effects of problem difficulty and student expertise on the utility of provided diagrams in probability problem solving. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2650-2655): Cognitive Science Society.
Boot, I. & Pecher, D. (in press). Representation of Categories: Metaphorical use of the Container schema. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Boot, I. & Pecher, D. (2010). Similarity is closeness: Metaphorical mapping in a perceptual task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 942-954.
Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M. (2002). The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185-188.
[DOI]
[URL]
Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, M. Garrett, & L. Nadel (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 385-436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[URL]
Bremner, A. J., Holmes, N. P., & Spence, C. (2008). Infants (lost) in peripersonal space? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(8), 298-305.
[DOI]
Bremner, J. G. & Andreasen, G. (1998). Young children's ability to use maps and models to find ways in novel spaces. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(2), 197-218.
Broaders, S., Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Making Children Gesture Reveals Implicit Knowledge and Leads to Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 539–550.
[URL]
Brockmole, J., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual Cueing in Naturalistic Scenes: Global and Local Contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32(4), 699-706.
[DOI]
Brosnan, M. J. (1998). Spatial ability in children’s play with Lego blocks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87(1), 19–28.
[DOI]
M. F. Brown & R. G. Cook (Eds.). (2006). Animal Spatial Cognition: Comparative, Neural, and Computational Approaches. Villanova University and Tufts University: M. F. Brown and R.G. Cook.
[URL]
Brown, M. F., Farley, R. F., & Lorek, E. J. (2007). Remembrance of places you passed: Social spatial working memory in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33(3), 213-224.
[DOI]
Brown, M. F. (2006). Spatial patterns: Behavioral control and cognitive representation. In E. A. Wasserman & T. R. Zentall (Eds.), Comparative Cognition: Experimental Explorations of Animal Intelligence (pp. 425-438). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bucher, L., Krumnack, A., Nejasmic, J., & Knauff, M. (2011). Cognitive processes underlying spatial belief revision. In L. A. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3477-3482): Cognitive Science Society.
Burgess, N. (2006). Spatial memory: How egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(12), 551-557.
[DOI]
Burgess, N., Becker, S., King, J., & O'Keefe, J. (2001). Memory for events and their spatial context: Models and experiments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 356(1413), 1493-1503.
Burigo, M. & Coventry, K. R. (2010). Context affects scale selection for proximity terms. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 10(4), 292-312.
[DOI]
Burigo, M. & Coventry, K. R. (2005). Reference frame conflict in assigning direction to space. In C. Freksa, M. Knauff, B. Krieg-Brückner, B. Nebel, & T. Barkowsky (Eds.), Spatial Cognition IV: Reasoning, Action, Interaction,: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3343 (pp. 111-123). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
[DOI]
Butcher, K. R. & Aleven, V. (2007). Integrating visual and verbal knowledge during classroom learning with computer tutors. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 137-142): Cognitive Science Society.
[URL]
Byrne, P. & Becker, S. (2004). Modelling mental navigation in scenes with multiple objects. Neural Computation, 16(9), 1851-1872.
[DOI]

C

Campos, J. L. & Bülthoff, H. H. (in press). Multisensory Integration during Self-Motion in Virtual Reality. In M. Wallace & M. Murray (Eds.), Frontiers in the Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes.
Carattin, E., Tatano, V., & Zanut, S. (2010). Wayfinding architectural design criteria for complex environments in ordinary and emergency scenarios. SFB/TR 8 Report No. 024-07/2010. Report series of the Transregional Collaborative Research Center SFB/TR 8 Spatial Cognition, David N. Rapp (ed), Universität Bremen/Universität Freiburg, 13-16.
Carlson, L. A. (2003). Using spatial language. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 43, 127-161.
[URL]
Carlson, L. A. & Kenny, R. (2006). Interpreting spatial terms involves simulating interactions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(4), 682-688.
[URL]
Carlson, L. A., Regier, T., Lopez, B., & Corrigan, B. (2006). Attention unites form and function in spatial language. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 6(4), 295-308.
[DOI]
[URL]
Carlson, L. A. & Van Deman, S. (2004). The space in spatial language. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(3), 418-436.
[DOI]
[URL]
Carr, M. & Janes, P. (2007, May). Spatial ability, gender and cognitive strategy use as predictors of mathematics subtest performance. Presented at the NSF sponsored workshop on spatial processing (Hancock, MI)
Carr, M., Shing, Lee, Yee, Steiner, H. H., & Kyser, B. (2005, April). A Comparison of predictors of gender differences in calculation, geometry and word problem solving. Presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA
Carr, M., Shing, Y. L., Janes, P., & Steiner, H. H. (2007, March). Early gender differences in strategy use and fluency: Implications for the emergence of gender differences in mathematics. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, MA.
Cartmill, E. A., Demir, O. E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Studying gesture. In E. Hoff (Ed.), Research Methods in Child Language: A Practical Guide, chapter 14 (pp. 208-225). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
[DOI]
Cartmill, E. A., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). A word in the hand: Human gesture links representations to actions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 367(1585), 129-143.
[DOI]
Cartmill, E. A., Pruden, S. M., Levine, S. C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). The role of parent gesture in children's spatial language development. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
[URL]
Castelhano, M. S. & Henderson, J. M. (2008). The Influence of Color on the Perception of Scene Gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 660-675.
[DOI]
Castelhano, M. S. & Henderson, J. M. (2007). Initial Scene Representations Facilitate Eye Movement Guidance in Visual Search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 753-763.
[DOI]
Castelhano, M. S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2009). Integration of multiple views of scenes. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics (formerly Perception & Psychophysics), 71(3), 490-502.
[DOI]
[URL]
Catrambone, R. & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15(6), 1147-1156.
Cattaneo, C. & Vecchi, T. (2008). Supramodality effects in visual and haptic spatial processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory ad Cognition, 34(3), 631-642.
Chabay, R. & Sherwood, B. (2006). Restructuring the introductory electricity and magnetism course. American Journal of Physics, 74(4), 329-336.
[DOI]
Chabay, R. & Sherwood, B. (2004). Modern Mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 72(4), 439-445.
[DOI]
Chai, X. J. & Jacobs, L. F. (2009). Sex difference in directional cue use in a virtual landscape. Behavioral Neuroscience, 123(2), 276–283.
[DOI]
Chan, T. T. & Bergen, B. (2005). Writing Direction Influences Spatial Cognition. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 412–417).
Chandrasekera, T. (2011, March). Using Soundscapes in Virtual Environments. Research presentation. Creative Activities Forum, University of Missouri-Columbia.
Chandrasekera, T. (2011). Using Soundscapes in Virtual Environments. Poster presentation. HES Week poster session, University of Missouri-Columbia.
Chandrasekera, T., Yoon, S. -Y., & D’Souza, N. (2012, May). Immersive Engines: Immersion in 3D Gaming platforms through Soundscapes. Environmental Design Research Association conference 2012, Seattle. Accepted Poster presentation
Chandrasekera, T., Yoon, S. -Y., & D’Souza, N. (2011, May). The Effect of Soundscapes on Immersive Experience in Virtual Environments. Proceedings of the Environmental Design Research Association Conference (EDRA): Lulu.com.
Chandrasekera, T., Yoon, S. -Y., & D’Souza, N. (2010, September). The Effect of Soundscapes on Immersive Experience in Virtual Environments. 15th Biannual Conference of the Design Communication Association, Bozeman, Montana.
Chang, M. D., Wetzel, J., & Forbus, K. (2011). Qualitative and Quantitative Reasoning over Physics Textbook Diagrams. Proceedings of the 25th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Barcelona, Spain.
Chariker, J. H., Naaz, F., & Pani, J. R. (2010). Computer-based learning of neuroanatomy: A longitudinal study of learning, transfer, & retention. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Chatterjee, A. (2008). The Neural Organization of Spatial Thought and Language. Seminars in Speech & Language, 29(3), 226-238.
[DOI]
Cheng, K. & Newcombe, N. S. (2006). Geometry, features, and orientation in vertebrate animals: A pictorial review. In M. F. Brown & R. G. Cook (Eds.), Animal Spatial Cognition: Comparative, Neural & Computational Approaches. In cooperation with Comparative Cognition Press.
[URL]
Childers, J. (2005). Is comparison useful for verb learning? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development
Chrastil, E. R. & Warren, W. H. (2012). Active and passive contributions to spatial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 1-23.
[DOI]
Christie, S. & Gentner, D. (2010). Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(3), 356-373.
[DOI]
Christoff, K. & Keramatian, K. (2007). Abstraction of mental representations: Theoretical considerations and neuroscientific evidence. In S. A. Bunge & J. D. Wallis (Eds.), Neuroscience of Rule-Guided Behavior (pp. 107-126). New York: Oxford University Press.
[DOI]
Chrysikou, E. G. (2006). When shoes become hammers: Goal-derived categorization training enhances problem solving performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 935-942.
Chrysikou, E. G. (in press). Creative states: A cognitive neuroscience approach to understanding and improving creativity in design. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Proceedings of the workshop Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. New York, NY: Springer.
Chrysikou, E. G. & Weisberg, R. W. (2005). Following the wrong footsteps: Fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1134-1148.
Cienki, A. (2002). Questions about mental imagery, gesture, and image schemas. Journal of Mental Imagery, 26, 43–46.
Cienki, A. (1998). Straight: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(2), 107–149.
[DOI]
Cienki, A. (1989). Spatial Cognition and the Semantics of Prepositions in English, Polish, and Russian, In the series Slavistische Beiträge Vol. 237. Munich: Sagner Verlag.
Cienki, A. (1999). The strengths and weaknesses of the left/right polarity in Russian: Diachronic and synchronic semantic analyses. In L. de Stadler & C. Eyrich (Eds.), Issues in Cognitive Linguistics: 1993 Proceedings of the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (pp. 299–329). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cienki, A. (2005). Image schemas and gesture. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 421–441). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
[DOI]
Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Cienki, A. (1997). Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In M. Verspoor, K. D. Lee, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning (pp. 3–15). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cifuentes-Férez, P. & Gentner, D. (2006). Naming motion events in Spanish and English. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 443-452.
[DOI]
Claramunt, C. & Winter, S. (2007). Structural Salience of Elements of the City. Environment and Planning B, 34(6), 1030-1050.
[DOI]
Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106(2), 1047-1058.
[DOI]
[URL]
Cooke-Simpson, A. & Voyer, D. (2007). Confidence and Gender Differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 181-186.
[DOI]
Cornoldi, C., Fastame, M. C., & Vecchi, T. (2003). Congenital blindness and spatial mental imagery. In A. Hatwell, A. Streri, & E. Gentaz (Eds.), Touching for knowing (pp. 173-187). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cornoldi, C., Marconi, F., & Vecchi, T. (2001). Visuospatial working memory in Turner's syndrome. Brain & Cognition, 46(1-2), 90-94.
[DOI]
Cornoldi, C. & Vecchi, T. (2003). Visuo-spatial working memory and individual differences. Hove and New York, UK/USA: Psychology Press.
Cornoldi, C. & Vecchi, T. (2000). Mental imagery in blind people: The role of passive and active visuo-spatial processes. In M. A. Heller (Ed.), Touch, representation, and blindness (pp. 143-181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corter, J. E., Mason, D. L., Tversky, B., & Nickerson, J. V. (2011). Identifying causal pathways with and without diagrams. In C. Hoelscher, T. F. Shipley, & L. A. Carlson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA (pp. 2715-2720): Cognitive Science Society.
Corter, J. E., Rho, Y., Zahner, D., Nickerson, J. V., & Tversky, B. (2009). Bugs and biases: Diagnosing misconceptions in the understanding of diagrams. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 756-761): Cognitive Science Society.
Corter, J. E. & Zahner, D. (2007). Use of external visual representations in probability problem solving. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(1), 22-50.
Coulter, B. & Kerski, J. J. (2005). Using GIS to transform the mathematical landscape. Technology-Supported Mathematical Learning Environments: 67th Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, chapter 22. Reston, VA: National Council of the Teachers of Mathematics.
Coventry, K. R. (in press). On the mapping between spatial language and the vision and action systems. In Y. Coello & A. Bartolo (Eds.), Language and Action in the Cognitive Neurosciences. Psychology Press.
Coventry, K. R. & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2008). Spatial language learning and the functional geometric framework. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, chapter 6 (pp. 114-138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coventry, K. R., Guijarro-Fuentes, P., & Valdés, B. (2011). Spatial language and second language acquisition. In V. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Language and Bilingual Cognition (pp. 262-286). Psychology Press.
K. R. Coventry & P. L. Olivier (Eds.). (2002). Spatial Language: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Dordrecht: The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
K. R. Coventry, T. Tenbrink, & J. Bateman (Eds.). (2009). Spatial Language and Dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coventry, K. R., Valdés, B., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2010). Thinking for speaking and immediate memory for spatial relations. In Z. -H. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking, chapter 4 (pp. 84-101). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, J. G., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 59–74.
[DOI]
Cuayáhuitl, H., Dethlefs, N., Richter, K. -F., Tenbrink, T., & Bateman, J. (2010). A Dialogue System for Indoor Wayfinding Using Text-Based Natural Language. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications, 1(1-2), 285–304.

D

D’Souza, N., Yoon, S. -Y., Balakrishnan, B., & Chandrasekera, T. (2011, May). Symposium presentation at “Virtual Environments - Virtual Behaviors”. Environmental Design Research Association conference, Chicago, IL.
Dasen, P. R. & Wassmann, J. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of spatial language and encoding in Bali and Geneva. In N. Srinivasan, A. K. Gupta, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Advances in cognitive science: 1 (pp. 64-276). New Delhi: Sage.
[URL]
Davies, C. & Uttal, D. H. (2007). Map use and the development of spatial cognition. In J. M. Plumert & J. P. Spencer (Eds.), The Emerging Spatial Mind, chapter 10 (pp. 219-247). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, J. & Goel, A. K. (2008). Visual re-representation in analogical reasoning. The Open Artificial Intelligence Journal, 2, 11-20.
[DOI]
DeCaro, M. S., Rotar, K. E., Kendra, M. S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Diagnosing and alleviating the impact of performance pressure on mathematical problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 63(8), 1619-1630.
[DOI]
M. Denis (Ed.). (1997). Langage et cognition spatiale. Paris: Masson.
Denis, M. (1991). Image and cognition (Revised English edition). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Denis, M. (1989). Image et cognition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Denis, M. (1979). Les images mentales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Denis, M. & Borst, G. (2006). Variations on the image scanning paradigm: What do they contribute to our knowledge of mental imagery? In T. Vecchi & G. Bottini (Eds.), Imagery and spatial cognition: Methods, models and cognitive assessment (pp. 49-68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
M. Denis, J. Engelkamp, & J. T. E. Richardson (Eds.). (1988). Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
M. Denis, et al. (Eds.). (2001). Imagery, language, and visuo-spatial thinking. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Denis, M. (2002). Can human brain construct visual mental images from linguistic inputs? In A. M. Galaburda, S. M. Kosslyn, & Y. Christen (Eds.), The languages of the brain, chapter 13 (pp. 215-225). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Denis, M. (2006). Psychological science in its multidisciplinary environment. In Q. Jing, M. R. Rosenzweig, G. d'Ydewalle, H. Zhang, H. C. Chen, & K. Zhang (Eds.), Progress in psychological science around the world: Vol. 1: Neural, cognitive and developmental issues (pp. 49-60). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
M. Denis, E. Mellet, & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.). (2004). Neuroimaging of mental imagery. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Denis, M., Michon, P. -E., & Tom, A. (2006). Assisting pedestrian wayfinding in urban settings: Why references to landmarks are crucial in direction-giving. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition: From research to cognitive technology, chapter 2 (pp. 25-51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Denis, M. (2000). Psychological science in cross-disciplinary contexts. In K. Pawlik & M. R. Rosenzweig (Eds.), The international handbook of psychology (pp. 585-597). London: Sage.
Denis, M., Ricalens, K., Baudouin, V., & Nespoulous, J. -L. (2006). Deficits in the spatial discourse of Alzheimer patients. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, chapter 15 (pp. 335-349). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
M. Denis & G. Sabah (Eds.). (1993). Modèles et concepts pour la science cognitive: Hommage à Jean-François Le Ny. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Deubel, H., Schneider, W. X., & Bridgeman, B. (2002). Transsaccadic memory of position and form. In J. Hyönä, D. P. Munoz, W. Heide, & R. Radach (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 140, chapter 11 (pp. 165-180). Elsevier.
[URL]
Dobnik, S. (2006). Learning spatial referential words with mobile robots. Proceedings of the 9th Annual CLUK Research colloquim, March 8-9.
Dodick, J. T. & Orion, N. (2003). Cognitive factors affecting student understanding of geological time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 415-442.
[DOI]
Doyle, R. A., Voyer, D., & Cherney, I. D. (2012). The relation between childhood spatial activities and spatial abilities in adulthood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 112-120.
[DOI]
Duckham, M., Winter, S., & Robinson, M. (2010). Including Landmarks in Routing Instructions. Journal for Location-Based Services, 4(1), 28-52.
[DOI]
Duffy, S., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (2005). It's all relative: How young children encode extent. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6(1), 51-63.
Dunn, Lloyd M. & Dunn, Leota M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

E

Edelson, D. C., Smith, D. A., & Brown, M. F. (2008). Beyond interactive mapping: bringing data analysis with GIS into the social studies classroom. In A. J. Millson & M. Alibrandi (Eds.), Digital Geography: Geo-spatial Technologies in the Social Studies Classroom. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Eggleston, A., Benedicto, E., & Balna, M. Y. (in press). Spatial frames of reference in Sumu-Mayangna. Special Issue: Language Sciences.
Eliot, J. Eliot Spatial Test Collection. Available in The Archives of the History of American Psychology
[URL]
Emmorey, K. (2002). The effects of modality on spatial language: How signers and speakers talk about space. In R. P. Meier, D. G. Quinto, & K. A. Cormier (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, chapter 15 (pp. 405-421). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[URL]
Engel, D., Bertel, S., & Barkowsky, T. (2005). Spatial Principles in Control of Focus in Reasoning with Mental Representations, Images, and Diagrams. In C. Freksa, M. Knauff, B. Krieg-Brückner, B. Nebel, & T. Barkowsky (Eds.), Spatial Cognition IV: Reasoning, Action, and Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3343 (pp. 181-203). Berlin: Springer.
[DOI]
Ertsen, M., Kooistra, J., & Stouffs, R. (2005). Active learning and the process of science: beyond information skills. In E. de Graaff, G. N. Saunders-Smits, & M. R. Nieweg (Eds.), Research and Practice of Active Learning in Engineering Education (pp. 71- 78). Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, Amsterdam University Press.

F

Fabrikant, S. I. (2005, March). Towards an understanding of geovisualization with dynamic displays: Issues and Prospects. Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) 2005 Spring Symposium Series: Reasoning with Mental and External Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance (pp. 6-11).
Fabrikant, S. I. & Montello, D. R. (2008). The effect of instructions on distance and similarity judgments in information spatializations. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 22(4), 463-478.
[DOI]
Fabrikant, S. I., Montello, D. R., Ruocco, M., & Middleton, R. S. (2004). The distance-similarity metaphor in network-display spatializations. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 31(4), 237-252.
[DOI]
Fabrikant, S. I. & Skupin, A. (2005). Cognitively plausible information visualization. In J. Dykes, A. M. MacEachren, & M. J. Kraak (Eds.), Exploring GeoVisualization (pp. 667-690). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Facoetti, A. (2004). Reading and selective spatial attention: Evidence from behavioral studies in dyslexic children. In H. D. Tobias (Ed.), Trends in Dyslexia Research (pp. 35-71). Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Farran, E. K. (2008). Strategies and biases in location memory in William syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities,, 29(5), 385-397.
[DOI]
Farran, E. K. (2006). Orientation coding: A specific deficit in Williams syndrome? Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(3), 397-414.
[DOI]
Farran, E. K. & Wilmut, K. (2007). Texture segmentation in Williams Syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 45(5), 1109-1018.
[DOI]
Feist, M. I. (2010). Inside in and on: Typological and psycholinguistic perspectives. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The state of the art and new directions. London: Equinox.
[URL]
Feist, M. I. (2004). Talking about space: A cross-linguistic perspective. In K. Forbus, T. Regier, & D. Gentner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375-380). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Feist, M. I. & Gentner, D. (2007). Spatial language influences memory for spatial scenes. Memory & Cognition, 35(2), 283-296.
[URL]
Feist, M. I. & Gentner, D. (2001). An influence of spatial language on recognition memory for spatial scenes. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 279-284): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fennema, E. & Tartre, L. A. (1985). The use of spatial skills in mathematics by girls and boys. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 184 -206.
[URL]
Fias, W. & Fischer, M. H. (2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition, chapter 3 (pp. 43-54). New York: Psychology Press.
Finlay, C., Motes, M. A., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Updating representations of learned scenes. Psychological Research, 71(3), 265-276.
[DOI]
Fischer, M. H. (2003). Cognitive representation of negative numbers. Psychological Science, 14(3), 278-282.
[DOI]
Fischer, M. H., Warlop, N., Hill, R. L., & Fias, W. (2004). Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 91-97.
[DOI]
Flanagan, R. (1996). Learning Through Direct vs. Indirect Experience: The role of interactivity and physicality in media effects (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(05), 1958. (UMI Dissertation Services).
Flanagan, R. & Black, J. B. (2001). Effects of learning from interaction with physical or mediated devices. In G. Burton & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Studies in Perception and Action VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flannery, K. A., Krauchunas, S., & Finn, P. (2000). Virtual cognition laboratory: A constructivist approach toward. In L. P. Nedel & R. S. Wazlawick (Eds.), Proceedings of the third workshop on virtual reality learning (pp. 89-95): Brazilian Computer Society.
Forbus, K. (2011, September). Analogy as a Computational Foundation for Problem-solving and Learning. Proceedings of Dagstuhl Seminar 11351.
Forbus, K. (2011, October). CogSketch: Sketch understanding for cognitive science research and for education. Presented a colloquium on Sketch Understanding to the Cognitive Science Program at Indiana University.
Forbus, K. (2011). Qualitative Reasoning: The last and next twenty-five years. Keynote address, 25th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Barcelona, Spain.
Forbus, K. (2011, September). Sketching our way to human-level AI. Presented a talk for the SFB/TR8 Spatial Cognition Colloquia series, Universität Bremen, Germany
Forbus, K. (2010). How can spatial language be learned? Dagstuhl Seminar 10131.
[URL]
Forbus, K. (2010). How should depiction be represented and reasoned about? Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 10131.
[URL]
Forbus, K., Ferguson, R., & Usher, J. (2001, January). Towards a computational model of sketching. Proceedings of IUI '01.
[URL]
Forbus, K., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19(2), 141-205.
[DOI]
[URL]
Forbus, K. (1995). Qualitative spatial reasoning: Framework and frontiers. In J. Glasgow, N. Narayanan, & B. Chandrasekaran (Eds.), Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives, chapter 6. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
[URL]
Forbus, K., Lovett, A., Lockwood, K., Wetzel, J., Matuk, C. F., Jee, B. D., & Usher, J. (2008). CogSketch. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1878-1879): AAAI Press.
[URL]
Forbus, K., Nielsen, P., & Faltings, B. (1991). Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: The CLOCK Project. Artificial Intelligence, 51(1-3), 417–471.
[DOI]
[URL]
Forbus, K. & Usher, J. (2002, January). Sketching for knowledge capture: A progress report. Proceedings of IUI'02.
[DOI]
[URL]
Forbus, K., Usher, J., Lovett, A., Lockwood, K., & Wetzel, J. (2008). CogSketch: Open-domain sketch understanding for cognitive science research and for education. In C. Alvarado & M. -P. Cani (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling (pp. 159-166).
[DOI]
[URL]
Frankenstein, J., Büchner, S., Tenbrink, T., & Hölscher, C. (2010). Influence of geometry and objects on local route choices during wayfinding. Spatial Cognition VII: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6222 . Portland, OR: Springer.
[DOI]
Freksa, C. (1992). Temporal reasoning based on semi-intervals. Artificial Intelligence, 54(1-2), 199-227.
[DOI]
Freksa, C. & Bertel, S. (2007). Eye movements and smart technology. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 37(7), 983-988.
[DOI]
C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.). (2003). Spatial Cognition III: Routes and Navigation, Human Memory and Learning, Spatial Representation and Spatial Learning. Spatial Cognition III: Routes and Navigation, Human Memory and Learning, Spatial Representation and Spatial Learning: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2685 . Berlin: Springer.
C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.). (2000). Spatial cognition II - Integrating abstract theories, empirical studies, formal methods, and practical applications. Spatial cognition II - Integrating abstract theories, empirical studies, formal methods, and practical applications: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1849 . Berlin: Springer.
Freksa, C. (1999). Spatial aspects of task-specific wayfinding maps: A representation-theoretic perspective. In J. S. Gero & B. Tversky (Eds.), Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design (pp. 15-32). Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney.
C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.). (1998). Spatial Cognition, An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge. Spatial Cognition, An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge. Berlin: Springer.
C. Freksa, M. Knauff, B. Krieg-Brückner, B. Nebel, & T. Barkowsky (Eds.). (2005). Spatial Cognition IV: Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Spatial Cognition IV: Reasoning, Action, Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3343 . Berlin: Springer.
Freksa, C. & Mark, D. M. (1999). Spatial information theory - Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. Spatial information theory - Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. Berlin: Springer.
Freksa, C. (1991). Qualitative spatial reasoning. In D. M. Mark & A. U. Frank (Eds.), Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space (pp. 361-372). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Freksa, C., Moratz, R., & Barkowsky, T. (2000). Robot navigation with schematic maps. In E. Pagello, et al. (Eds.), Intelligent Autonomous Systems: 6 (pp. 809-816).
Frick, A., Daum, M. M., Walser, S., & Mast, F. W. (2009). Motor processes in children's mental rotation. Journal of Cognition and Development, 10(1), 18-40.
[DOI]
Frick, A., Daum, M. M., Wilson, M., & Wilkening, F. (2009). Effects of action on children's and adults' mental imagery. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(1), 34-51.
[DOI]
[URL]
Frost, B. J. & Sun, H. -J. (2003). The biological basis of time to collision computation. In H. Hecht & G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Time-to-contact: Advances in Psychology Series: 135 (pp. 13-37). Amsterdam (North Holland): Elsevier.
[URL]
Furbach, U., Dirlich, G., & Freksa, C. (1985). Towards a theory of knowledge representation systems. In W. Bibel & B. Petkoff (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence Methodology, Systems, Applications (pp. 77-84). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

G

Galea, L. A. & Kimura, D. (1993). Sex differences in route-learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 53–65.
[DOI]
Gentner, D. (2011, September). The Analogical Mind. Dagstuhl Seminar 11351.
Gentner, D. (2007). Spatial cognition in apes and humans. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(5), 192-194.
[DOI]
[URL]
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170.
Gentner, D. & Anggoro, F. K. (2011, April). Examining Analogical Reasoning in the Process of Learning Science. Paper presented ath the 2011 Annual Meeting of AERA. Session #: 78.016.
Gentner, D. & Bowerman, M. (2009). Why some spatial semantic categories are harder to learn than others: The typological prevalence hypothesis. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, S. Ervin-Tripp, N. Budwig, K. Nakamura, & S. Özçaliskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, chapter 34 (pp. 465-480). London: Psychology Press.
[URL]
Gentner, D. & Christie, S. (in press). No symbols, no dice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Gentner, D. & Christie, S. (in press, 2012). Language and cognition in development. In M. M. Spivey, K. McRae, & M. F. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics, chapter 33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D. & Christie, S. (2006). Using numbers to structure space. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 267-272). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[URL]
Gentner, D., Levine, S. C., Dhillon, S., & Poltermann, A. (2009). Using structural alignment to facilitate learning of spatial concepts in an informal setting. In B. Kokinov, K. J. Holyoak, & D. Gentner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Analogy. Sofia, Bulgaria: NBU Press.
Gentner, D. & Loewenstein, J. (2002). Relational language and relational thought. In J. Byrnes & E. Amsel (Eds.), Language, literacy, and cognitive development, chapter 4 (pp. 87-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[URL]
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Hung, B. (2007). Comparison facilitates children's learning of names for parts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8(3), 285-307.
[DOI]
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393-408.
[DOI]
Gentner, D. & Namy, L. (2006). Analogical processes in language learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 297-301.
[DOI]
Gentner, D. & Namy, L. (1999). Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development, 14(4), 487-513.
[DOI]
Gentner, D. & Rattermann, M. J. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 225-277). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D., Simms, N., & Flusberg, S. (2009). Relational language helps children reason analogically. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1054-1059): Cognitive Science Society.
Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1-38.
[DOI]
Ginsburg, H. (2006). Mathematical play and playful mathematics: A guide for early education. In D. Singer, R. M. Golinkoff, & K. Hirsh-Pasek (Eds.), Play = Learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth, chapter 8 (pp. 145–165). New York: Oxford University Press.
Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2010). Trading spaces: Carving up events for learning language. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 33-42.
[DOI]
Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2009). Processing figures and grounds in dynamic and static events. In J. Chandlee, M. Franchini, S. Lord, & S. Rheiner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 199-210): Cascadilla Press.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Learning through gesture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (WIREs): Cognitive Science, 2(6), 595–607.
[DOI]
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). When gesture does and does not promote learning. Language and Cognition, 2(1), 1-19.
[DOI]
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldin-Meadow, S. & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Action's influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives in Psychological Science., 5(6), 664-674.
[DOI]
Goldin-Meadow, S. & Cook, S. W. (2005). How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(5), 234-241.
[DOI]
Goldin-Meadow, S. & Cook, S. W. (2012). Gesture in thought. In K. J. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning, chapter 32. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Kim, S., & Singer, M. (1999). What the teacher's hands tell the student's mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 720-730.
Goldschmidt, G. (2003). The backtalk of self-generated sketches. Design Issues, 19(1), 72-88.
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123-143.
Golledge, R. G., Marsh, M. J., & Battersby, S. E. (2008). A conceptual framework for facilitating geospatial thinking. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98(2), 285-308.
[DOI]
M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, & M. J. Spivey (Eds.). (2007). Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goodchild, M. F. & Janelle, D. G. (2004). Thinking Spatially in the Social Sciences. In M. F. Goodchild & D. G. Janelle (Eds.), Spatially Integrated Social Science, chapter 1 (pp. 3-17). New York: Oxford University Press.
Goodchild, M. F., Janelle, D. G., & Grossner, K. E. (in press). Critical Spatial Thinking. In R. J. Stimson (Ed.), Handbook in Spatially Integrated Social Science Research Methods. Edwards Elgar.
Goodsell, D. S. (2009). Fact and Fantasy in Nanotech Imagery. Leonardo, 42(1), 52-57.
[DOI]
Goodsell, D. S. (2009). Neuromuscular Synapse. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Education (BAMBED), 37(4), 204-210.
[DOI]
Goodsell, D. S. (2009). The Machinery of Life (2nd Edition). New York: Springer-Verlag.
[URL]
Goodsell, D. S. (2007). Making the Step from Chemistry to Biology and Back. Nature Chemical Biology, 3(11), 681-684.
[DOI]
Goodsell, D. S. (2005). Visual Methods from Atoms to Cells. Structure, 13(3), 347-354.
[DOI]
Goolkasian, P. & Foos, P. W. (2002). Presentation Format and Its Effect on Working Memory. Memory & Cognition, 30(7), 1096-1105.
Gradstein, F. M. & Ogg, J. G. (2009). The Geologic Time Scale. In B. Hedges & S. Kumar (Eds.), The Timetree of Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gramann, K., el Sharkawy, J., & Deubel, H. (2009). Eye-movements during navigation in a virtual tunnel. International Journal of Neuroscience, 119(10), 1755-1778.
[DOI]
Gramann, K., Müller, H. J., Eick, E. -M., & Schönebeck, B. (2005). Evidence of Separable Spatial Representations in a Virtual Navigation Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1199-1223.
[DOI]
[URL]
Gray, E. R. & Spetch, M. L. (2006). Pigeons encode absolute distance but relational direction from landmarks and walls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32(4), 474-480.
[DOI]
Grodner, D., Pietsch, C., & Durgin, F. (2009). The Use of Categorical Features in Adult Spatial Reorientation. Proceedings of the 2009 Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
[URL]
Grossberg, S. (2000). The complementary brain: Unifying brain dynamics and modularity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 233-246.
[DOI]
Gunzelmann, G. & Lyon, D. R. (2007). Mechanisms of human spatial competence. In T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat, & D. R. Montello (Eds.), Spatial Cognition V: Reasoning, Action, Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4387 (pp. 288-307). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Gureckis, T. M. & Markant, D. (2009). Active Learning Strategies in a Spatial Concept Learning Game. In N. A. Taatgen, H. van Rijn, L. Schomaker, & J. Nerbonne (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3145-3150). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Gwizdka, J. & Spence, I. (2007). Implicit measures of lostness and success in web navigation. Interacting with Computers, 19(3), 357-369.
[DOI]

H

Halpern, D. F. & Collaer, M. L. (2005). Sex differences in visuospatial abilities: More than meets the eye. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, chapter 5 (pp. 170-212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[DOI]
Hamrick, J., Battaglia, P., & Tenenbaum, J. (2011). Internal physics models guide probabilistic judgments about object dynamics. Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1545-1550).
[URL]
Harris, J. & Newcombe, N. S. (2010, May). Measuring spatial visualization through folding. Poster session presented at the Inter-Science of Learning Center Student and Post-doc Conference, Boston, MA.
Hasselmo, M. E. (2005). A model of prefrontal cortical mechanisms for goal directed behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(7), 1115-1129.
[DOI]
[URL]
Haun, D. B. M., Rapold, C., Call, J., Janzen, G., & Levinson, S.C. (2006). Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 103(46), 17568-17573.
[DOI]
Heft, H. (1983). Way finding as the perception of information over time. Population and Environment: Behavioral and Social Issues, 6, 133-150.
Heft, H. (1979). The role of environmental features in route learning: Two exploratory studies of way finding. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 3, 172-185.
Heft, H. (1996). The ecological approach to navigation: A Gibsonian perspective. In J. Portugali (Ed.), The construction of cognitive maps (pp. 105-132). Dordrect: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Heft, H. & Wohlwill, J. F. (1987). Environmental cognition in children. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (pp. 175 204). New York: John Wiley.
Hegarty, M. & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), Handbook of Higher-level Visuospatial Thinking, chapter 4 (pp. 121 - 169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[DOI]
Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33-46.
Hinze, S. R., Rapp, D. N., Williamson, V. M., Shultz, M. J., Williamson, K. C., & Deslongchamps, G. (2011, October). Spatial abilities influence the use of dynamic chemistry visualizations. Poster presented at the annual REESE PI Meeting of the National Science Foundation, Washington D.C.
Hinze, S. R., Rapp, D. N., Williamson, V. M., Shultz, M. J., Williamson, K. C., & Deslongchamps, G. (2011, May). Spatial abilities influence the use of dynamic chemistry visualizations. Poster presented at the annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science, Washington, D. C.
Hinze, S. R., Rapp, D. N., Williamson, V. M., Shultz, M. J., Williamson, K. C., & Deslongchamps, G. (, April). Beyond the ball-and-stick: Students’ processing of novel STEM visualizations. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, to happen in 2012, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Hinze, S. R., Rapp, D. N., Williamson, V. M., Shultz, M. J., Williamson, K. C., & Deslongchamps, G. (2011, July). Unlocking potential: Individual differences in the use of concurrent scientific visualizations. In L. A. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2721-2726). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.). (2006). Action meets word: How children learn verbs. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hirtle, S. C., Richter, K. -F., Srinivas, S., & Firth, R. (2010). This is the Tricky Part: When Directions Become Difficult. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 1(1), 53-73.
[URL]
Hirtle, S. C., Timpf, S., & Tenbrink, T. (2011). The Effect of Activity on Relevance and Granularity for Navigation. In M. J. Egenhofer, N. A. Giudice, R. Moratz, & M. Worboys (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2011), 6899 (pp. 73-89). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
[DOI]
Hofstadter, D. F. (2000). Analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), Analogy: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 499-538). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Holden, M. P., Curby, K., Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2010). A category adjustment approach to memory for spatial location in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 590-604.
[DOI]
Holden, M. P. & Newcombe, N. S. (in press). The development of adaptive spatial processing. In L. Nadel & D. Waller (Eds.), Handbook of spatial cognition. APA Books.
Holliday-Darr, K., Blasko, D., & Dwyer, C. (1999). Improving Cognitive Visualization with a Web-Based Interactive Assessment and Training program. Proceedings American Society for Engineering Educators, Engineering Design Graphics Division 54th Annual Mid Year Meeting (pp. 147-151).
Holmes, K. J. & Lourenco, S. F (2011). Horizontal trumps vertical in the spatial organization of numerical magnitude. In L. A. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2276-2281). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Holmes, K. J. & Wolff, P. (2010). Simulation from schematics: Dorsal stream processing and the perception of implied motion. In R. Catrambone & S. Ohlsson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2704-2709): Cognitive Science Society.
[URL]
Hölscher, C., Büchner, S., Brösamle, M., Meilinger, T., & Strube, G. (2007). Signs and Maps – Cognitive Economy in the Use of External Aids for Indoor Navigation. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 377-382). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
[URL]
Hölscher, C., Büchner, S., Meilinger, T., & Strube, G. (2007). Map Use and Wayfinding Strategies in a Multi-Building Ensemble. In T. Barkowsky, et al. (Eds.), Spatial Cognition V - Reasoning, Action, Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4387 (pp. 365–380). Springer.
[DOI]
C. Hölscher, T. F. Shipley, M. Olivetti Belardinelli, J. Bateman, & N. S. Newcombe (Eds.). (2010). Spatial Cognition VII: Learning, reasoning and talking about space. Spatial Cognition VII: Learning, reasoning and talking about space: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6222 . Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297-315.
[DOI]
Hostetter, A. B. & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(3), 495-514.
[DOI]
Hostetter, A. B. & Skirving, C. J. (2011). The effect of visual vs. verbal stimuli on gesture production. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35(3), 205-223.
[DOI]
Hubbard, T. L. (2004). The perception of causality: Insights from Michotte's launching effect, naive impetus theory, and representational momentum. In A. M. Oliveira, M. P. Teixeira, G. F. Borges, & M. J. Ferro (Eds.), Fechner Day 2004 (pp. 116-121). Coimbra, Portugal: The International Society for Psychophysics.
[URL]
Hubbard, T. L. (2008). Representational momentum as a new Gestalt principle. In B. A. Schneider, B. M. Ben-David, S. Parker, & W. Wong (Eds.), Fechner Day 2008. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 333-338): The International Society for Psychophysics.
[URL]
Hund, A. M. & Plumert, J. M. (2005). The stability and flexibility of spatial categories. Cognitive Psychology, 50(1), 1-44.
[DOI]
Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Huttenlocher, J. (2008). Coding location: The view from toddler studies. American Psychologist, 63(8), 641-648.
[DOI]
Huttenlocher, J., Levine, S. C., & Ratliff, K. R. (in press). Emerging ability to determine size: Use of measurement. In N. L. Stein & S. Raudenbush (Eds.), Developmental Science Goes to School: Implications for Education and Public Policy Research. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Huttenlocher, J., Levine, S. C., & Ratliff, K. R. (in press). The development of measurement: From holistic perceptual comparison to unit understanding. In N. L. Stein & S. Raudenbush (Eds.), Developmental Science Goes to School: Implications for Education and Public Policy Research. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Huttenlocher, J. & Lourenco, S. F (2007). Using spatial categories to reason about location. In J. M. Plumert & J. P. Spencer (Eds.), The Emerging Spatial Mind (pp. 3-24). New York: Oxford University Press.
Huttenlocher, J., Newcombe, N. S., & Vasilyeva, M. (1999). Spatial scaling in young children. Psychological Science, 10(5), 393-398.
[DOI]
Huttenlocher, J. & Vasilyeva, M. (2003). How toddlers represent enclosed spaces. Cognitive Science, 27, 749-766.

I

Ishikawa, T. & Yamazaki, T. (2009). Showing where to go by maps or pictures: An empirical case study at subway exits. In K. S. Hornsby, C. Claramunt, M. Denis, & G. Ligozat (Eds.), Spatial information theory: LNCS 5756 (pp. 330-341). Berlin: Springer.
[DOI]
Iverson, J. M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16(5), 367-371.
[DOI]

J

Jameson, J. & Gentner, D. (2008). Causal status and explanatory goodness in categorization. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 291-296). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Jameson, J. & Gentner, D. (2006, July). Systematicity as a processing constraint on feature centrality. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
Janelle, D. G. & Goodchild, M. F. (2011). Concepts, Principles, Tools, and Challenges in Spatially Integrated Social Science. In T. Nyerges, R. McMaster, & H. Couclelis (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of GIS and Society, chapter 2. Sage Publications.
Janzen, G. (2006). Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(3), 493-508.
[DOI]
Jee, B. D., Gentner, D., Forbus, K., Sageman, B., & Uttal, D. H. (2009). Drawing on Experience: Use of sketching to evaluate knowledge of spatial scientific concepts. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2499-2504): Cognitive Science Society.
Jee, B. D., Uttal, D. H., & Gentner, D. (2011, April). Learning With Spatial, Embedded, and Embodied Representations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of AERA. Session #: 74.020.
Jee, B. D., Uttal, D. H., & Gentner, D. (2011). The Role of Alignment in Learning Geoscience Structures. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans.
Johnson, A., Coventry, K. R., & Thompson, E. M. (2009). The effect of goals on memory for human mazes in real and virtual space. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1752-1757): Cognitive Science Society.

K

Kali, Y. (2002). CILT2000: Visualization and Modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(3), 305-310.
[URL]
Kali, Y. & Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 369-391.
[DOI]
[URL]
Kastens, K. A. & Ishikawa, T. (2006). Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: A cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields. In C. A. Manduca & D. W. Mogk (Eds.), Earth and Mind: How Geologists Think and Learn about the Earth: Geological Society of America Special Paper 413 (pp. 53-76).
Kelly, J. W., Avraamides, M. N., & Loomis, J. M. (2007). Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 33(6), 1092-1107.
[DOI]
Kerski, J. J. (2008). Toward An International Education Community. Digital Geography. Information Age Publishing.
Kerski, J. J. (2007). GIS in Education. Handbook of GIS. Blackwell Publishers.
[URL]
Kerski, J. J. (2006). Earth Visions: GIS in Indian Country. Winds of Change, 21(3).
Kerski, J. J. (2006). Mapping for understanding our changing world. The Earth Scientist, 22(1), 6-10.
Kerski, J. J. (2004, March). Analyzing the Earth with Geographic Information Systems. National Speleological Society (NSS) News.
Kerski, J. J. (2002). Introducing Geography and Technology into Science through Biodiversity. Meridian: A Middle School Technology Journal, 5(1).
[URL]
Kerski, J. J. (2004). GIS for Citizenship Education. In A. Kent & A. Powell (Eds.), Geography and Citizenship Education 2004: Research Perspectives (pp. 129-138). London, UK: IGU Committee on Geographic Education, Univ of London.
Kerski, J. J., Linn, S., & Gindele, R. (2005). Mapping standardised test scores with other variables using GIS. International Research in Geographic and Environmental Education, 14(3), 231–236.
[DOI]
Khetarpal, N., Majid, A., Malt, B., Sloman, S., & Regier, T. (2010). Similarity judgments reflect both language and cross-language tendencies: Evidence from two semantic domains. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 358-363). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Khetarpal, N., Majid, A., & Regier, T. (2009). Spatial terms reflect near-optimal spatial categories. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2396-2401).
Kim, J. -S., Gračanin, D., Matkovic, K., & Quek, F. (2010). The Effects of Finger-Walking in Place (FWIP) for Spatial Knowledge Acquisition in Virtual Environments. Proceedings of 10th International Symposium on Smart Graphics, 6133 (pp. 56-67): Springer-Verlag.
Kim, J. -S., Gračanin, D., Matkovic, K., & Quek, F. (2008). Finger Walking in Place (FWIP): a Traveling Technique in Virtual Environments. Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on Smart Graphics, 5166 (pp. 58–69): Springer-Verlag.
[DOI]
Kim, Y. S., Cho, J. Y., & Park, J. A. (2006). Visual Reasoning and Design. Design Computing and Cognition Conference, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., & Uchida, Y. K. (2007). Self as cultural mode of being. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), The Handbook of Cultural Psychology, chapter 6 (pp. 136-174). New York: Guilford Press.
Klenk, M., Forbus, K., Tomai, E., Kim, H., & Kyckelhahn, B. (2005). Solving Everyday Physical Reasoning Problems by Analogy using Sketches. Proceedings of 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-05). Pittsburgh, PA: AAAI Press.
[URL]
Klenk, M. (2009). Transfer as a Benchmark for Multi-Representational Architectures. In U. Kurup & B. Chandrasekaran (Eds.), Multirepresentational Architectures for Human-Level Intelligence (pp. 20-21): AAAI Press.
[URL]
Klippel, A., Freksa, C., & Winter, S. (2006). You-are-here maps in emergencies -the danger of getting lost. Journal of Spatial Science, 51(1), 117-131.
[DOI]
[URL]
Klippel, A., Knuf, L., Hommel, B., & Freksa, C. (2005). Perceptually induced distortions in cognitive maps. In C. Freksa, M. Knauff, & B. Krieg-Brückner (Eds.), Spatial Cognition IV: Reasoning, Action, and Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3343 (pp. 204-213). Berlin: Springer.
[URL]
Klippel, A., Lee, P. U., Fabrikant, S. I., Montello, D. R., & Bateman, J. (2005). The Cognitive Conceptual Approach as a Leitmotif for Map Design. Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) 2005 Spring Symposium Series: Reasoning with Mental and External Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance (pp. 90-95).
Klippel, A. & Montello, D. R. (2007). Linguistic and nonlinguistic turn direction concepts. In S. Winter, M. Duckham, L. Kulik, & B. Kuipers (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Spatial information theory (COSIT'07) (pp. 354-372): Springer-Verlag.
[URL]
Klippel, A., Richter, K. -F., Barkowsky, T., & Freksa, C. (2005). The Cognitive Reality of Schematic Maps. In L. Meng, A. Zipf, & T. Reichenbacher (Eds.), Map-based Mobile Services - Theories, Methods and Implementations (pp. 57-74). Berlin: Springer.
[URL]
Klippel, A., Tappe, H., Kulik, L., & Lee, P. U. (2005). Wayfinding choremes - A language for modeling conceptual route knowledge. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 16(4), 311-329.
[DOI]
[URL]
Klippel, A., Worboys, M., & Duckham, M. (2008). Identifying factors of geographic event conceptualization. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(2), 183-204.
[DOI]
Knauff, M. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 30(3), 363-371.
[URL]
Knauff, M., Jola, C., & Strube, G. (2001). Spatial reasoning: No need for visual information. In D. R. Montello (Ed.), Proceedings on the 6th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT 2001 (pp. 759-765). Berlin: Springer.
Knauff, M. & May, E. (2006). Mental imagery, reasoning, and blindness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(1), 161-177.
[DOI]
Kolvoord, R., Charles, M., & Purcell, S. (in press, 2012). What Happens After the Professional Development: Case Studies on Implementing GIS in the Classroom. In M. Barnett, J. MaKinster, & N. Trautmann (Eds.), Learning Science Through the Innovative Use of Geospatial Technologies Designing Effective Learning Tools and Programs for K-16 Settings. Springer-Verlag.
[URL]
Kolvoord, R., Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., & Lineweaver, L. (2011). Using Video Case Studies to Assess the Impact of the Use of GIS on Secondary Students’ Spatial Thinking Skills. Presented at the International Conference on Spatial Thinking and Geographic Information Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Kooistra, J., Stouffs, R., Hopstaken, R., Tunçer, B., Groesbeek, E. J., & Sjoer, E. (2005). Keyset: Conceptual, technical, didactic and strategic qualities of a 'discourse browser'. In S. Sariyildiz & B. Tunçer (Eds.), Innovation in Architecture, Engineering and Construction: 1 (pp. 353-363). Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Chair Technical Design & Informatics.
Kozhevnikov, M. & Hegarty, M. (2001). Mental rotation and spatial orientation abilities. Memory & Cognition, 29(5), 745-756.
Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. (2002). Visual/spatial abilities in problem solving in physics. In M. Anderson, B. Meyer, & P. L. Olivier (Eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning (pp. 155-173). Springer-Verlag.
Kozhevnikov, M. & Motes, M. A. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 549-579.
[DOI]
Krakowski, M., Ratliff, K. R., Gomez, L., & Levine, S. C. (2010, June). Spatial intelligence and the research: Practice challenge. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 1 (pp. 556-563). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Kranjec, A., Lehet, M., Bromberger, B., & Chatterjee, A. (2010). A Sinister Bias for Calling Fouls in Soccer. PLoS ONE, 5(7), e11667.
  • []: Funding: The study was supported by NIH grants RO1 HD050199 and RO1 DC008779. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
[DOI]
Krumnack, A., Bucher, L., Nejasmic, J., & Knauff, M. (2011). Efficiency and minimal change in spatial belief revision. In L. A. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2270-2275): Cognitive Science Society.
Krumnack, A., Bucher, L., Nejasmic, J., & Knauff, M. (2010). Spatial reasoning as verbal reasoning. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1002-1007): Cognitive Science Society.
Krumnack, A., Bucher, L., Nejasmic, J., Nebel, B., & Knauff, M. (2011). A model for relational reasoning as verbal reasoning. Cognitive Systems Research, 12((3-4)), 377-392.
[DOI]
Kuhn, W. (2007). An Image-Schematic Account of Spatial Categories. Spatial Information Theory, 8th International Conference, COSIT 2007, 4736 (pp. 152-168). Melbourne, Australia: Springer.
[DOI]
Kuhn, W. (2005). Geospatial Semantics: Why, of What, and How? Journal on Data Semantics (pp. 1-24): Special Issue on Semantic-based Geographical Information Systems, Spring 2005, LNCS 3534.
Kuhn, W. (2003). Semantic Reference Systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Guest Editorial, 17(5), 405-409.
Kuhn, W. (2001). Ontologies in support of activities in geographical space. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(7), 613-631.
Kuhn, W. (2007). Metaphor, Spatial and Map. In K. K. Kemp (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Science (pp. 281-284): Sage Publications.
Kuhn, W. (2009). Semantic Engineering. In G Navratil (Ed.), Research Trends in Geographic Information Science (pp. 63-74): Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography.
Kuipers, B. (2000). The spatial semantic hierarchy. Artificial Intelligence, 119, 191-233.
Kurtz, K. J., Miao, C., & Gentner, D. (2001). Learning by analogical bootstrapping. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 417-446.

L

Landau, B., Dessalegn, B., & Goldberg, A. (2011). Language and Space: Momentary Interactions. In P. Chilton & V. Evans (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions, chapter 2: Advances in Cognitive Linguistics . Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing.
Lange-Küttner, C. (2009). Viewing and attention in children. Acta Paediatrica, 98(10), 1553-1555.
[DOI]
Lange-Küttner, C. (2004). More evidence on size modification in spatial axes system of varying complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88(2), 171-192.
[DOI]
Lange-Küttner, C. & Edelstein, W. (1995). The contribution of social factors to the development of graphic competence. In C. Lange-Küttner & G. V. Thomas (Eds.), Drawing and looking. Theoretical approaches to pictorial representation in children (pp. 159-172). Hemel Hempstead/ New York: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Lange-Küttner, C. & Finn, C. (2008). Musical notation and fine motor skills when playing the soprano recorder: Making a neural network lift a finger. In M. Schlesinger, L. Berthouze, & C. Balkenius (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling cognitive development in robotic systems, Lund University Cognitive Studies, 139 (pp. 69-76).
Lange-Küttner, C. & Green, H. (2007). What is the age of mental rotation? Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Development and Learning (pp. 259-263): IEEE Press.
[DOI]
Lange-Küttner, C. (2008). Figures in and out of context: Absent, simple, complex and halved spatial fields. In C. Lange-Küttner & A. Vinter (Eds.), Drawing and the non-verbal mind: A life-span perspective, chapter 10 (pp. 199-220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[DOI]
Lange-Küttner, C. (2008). Size and contour as crucial parameters in children drawing images. In C. Milbrath & H. -M. Trautner (Eds.), Children's understanding and production of pictures, drawing and art - Theoretical and empirical approaches (pp. 89-106). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Lange-Küttner, C. & Reith, E. (1995). The transformation of figurative thought: Implications of Piaget and Inhelder`s developmental theory for children`s drawings. In C. Lange-Küttner & G. V. Thomas (Eds.), Drawing and looking: Theoretical approaches to pictorial representation in children (pp. 75-92). Hemel Hempstead / New York: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.
C. Lange-Küttner & A. Vinter (Eds.). (2008). Drawing and the non-verbal mind: A life-span perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lange-Küttner, C. & Vinter, A. (2008). Contemporary approaches to a long-standing domain: Drawing research. In C. Lange-Küttner & A. Vinter (Eds.), Drawing and the non-verbal mind: A life-span perspective, chapter 1 (pp. 1-18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawton, C. A. (2010). Gender, spatial abilities, and wayfinding. In D. Chrisler & D. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology. New York: Springer.
Learmonth, A. E. & Newcombe, N. S. (2010). The development of place learning in comparative perspective. In F. Dolins & R. Mitchell (Eds.), Spatial Cognition, Spatial Perception: Mapping the Self and Space, chapter 23 (pp. 520-538). Cambridge University Press.
Leeb-Lundberg, K. (1996). The block builder mathematician. In E. S. Hirsh (Ed.), The block book (pp. 34–60). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Lester, B. D., Hecht, L. N., & Vecera, S. P. (2009). Visual prior entry for foreground figures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,, 16, 654-659.
[DOI]
Levine, S. C. (2009, October). Individual variation in preschooler's mathematical and spatial knowledge: Parent talk matters. Symposium Talk. Cognitive Development Society VI Biennial Meeting, San Antonio, TX.
Levine, S. C., Gunderson, E. A., & Huttenlocher, J. (2010). Number Development in Context: Variations in Home and School Input During the Preschool Years. In N. L. Stein & S. Raudenbush (Eds.), Developmental Cognitive Science Goes to School, chapter 13. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Taylor, A., & Langrock, A. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 940-949.
[DOI]
Levine, S. C., Kwon, M. -K., Huttenlocher, J., Ratliff, K. R., & Dietz, K. (2009). Children's understanding of ruler measurement and units of measure: A training study. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2391-2395): Cognitive Science Society.
Levinthal, B. R. & Franconeri, S. L. (2011). Common fate grouping as feature selection. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1132-1137.
[DOI]
Li, H. & Giudice, N. A. (2011, April). Finding the Minimal Information set for Assisting navigation in multilevel indoor spaces. Poster Presentation at the University of Maine Graduate Expo.
[URL]
Li, H. & Giudice, N. A. (2011). Finding the Optimal Visual Interface for Assisting Navigation. Doctoral colloquium talk given at the Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2011), Belfast, ME.
Lin, C. -T., Yang, F. -S., Chiou, T. -C., Ko, L. -W., Duann, J. -R., & Gramann, K. (2009). EEG-based spatial navigation estimation in a virtual reality driving environment. Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering (pp. 435-438).
[DOI]
Linn, M. C. & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, Teachers, and Peers: Science Learning Partners. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Linn, S., Kerski, J. J., & Wither, S. (2005). Development of Evaluation Tools for GIS: How Does GIS Affect Student Learning? International Research in Geographic and Environmental Education, 14(3), 217–224.
Lockman, J. J. (2005). Tool use: Developmental and evolutionary considerations. In V. Roux & B. Bril (Eds.), Stone Knapping : The necessary conditions for a uniquely hominid behaviour: McDonald Institute Monograph (pp. 319-330). London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
[URL]
Lockwood, K., Forbus, K., Halstead, D., & Usher, J. (2006). Automatic Categorization of Spatial Prepositions. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
[URL]
Lockwood, K., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2005). SpaceCase: A model of spatial preposition use. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
[URL]
Lockwood, K., Lovett, A., Dehghani, M., & Usher, J. (2008). A Theory of Depiction for Sketches of Physical Systems. In E. Bradley & L. Travé-Massuyès (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning.
Lockwood, K., Lovett, A., & Forbus, K. (2008). Automatic Classification of Containment and Support Spatial Relations in English and Dutch. Spatial Cognition VI: Learning, Reasoning, and Talking about Space: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5248 (pp. 283-294). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
[DOI]
Lockwood, K., Lovett, A., Forbus, K., Dehghani, M., & Usher, J. (2008). Automatic Interpretation of Depiction Conventions in Sketched Diagrams. In C. Alvarado & M. -P. Cani (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling (pp. 167-173).
[DOI]
Logie, R. H. & Denis, M. (1991). Mental images in human cognition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Loomis, J. M., Golledge, R. G., Klatzky, R. L., & Marston, J. R. (2007). Assisting wayfinding in visually impaired travelers. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition: From research to cognitive technology (pp. 179-202). Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Avraamides, M. N., Lippa, Y., & Golledge, R. G. (2007). Functional equivalence of spatial images produced by perception and spatial language. In F. W. Mast & L. Jäncke (Eds.), Spatial processing in navigation, imagery, and perception (pp. 29-48). New York: Springer.
Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., & Philbeck, J. W. (1999). Human navigation by path integration. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 125-151). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Lovett, A., Dehghani, M., & Forbus, K. (2008). Building and comparing qualitative descriptions of three-dimensional design sketches. Proceedings of the 22nd International Qualitative Reasoning Workshop.
[URL]
Lovett, A. & Forbus, K. (2010). Shape is like space: Modeling shape representation as a set of qualitative spatial relations. AAAI Spring Symposium Series: Cognitive Shape Processing (pp. 21-27).
Lovett, A. & Forbus, K. (2009). Computing human-like qualitative topological relations via visual routines. Proceedings of the 23rd International Qualitative Reasoning Workshop (pp. 76-83).
Lovett, A. & Forbus, K. (2009). Using a visual routine to model the computational of positional relations. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1882-1887): Cognitive Science Society.
Lovett, A., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2007). Analogy with qualitative spatial representations can simulate solving Raven's Progressive Matrices. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 449-454). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Lovett, A., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2010). A structure-mapping model of Raven's Progressive Matrices. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2761-2766). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Lovett, A., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2007). Using qualitative representations and analogical mapping to solve problems from a spatial intelligence test. In C. Price (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st International Qualitative Reasoning Workshop (pp. 79-86).
Lovett, A., Gentner, D., Forbus, K., & Sagi, E. (2009). Using analogical mapping to simulate time-course phenomena in perceptual similarity. Cognitive Systems Research: Special Issue on Analogies - Integrating Cognitive Abilities, 10(3), 216-228.
[DOI]
Lovett, A., Lockwood, K., Dehghani, M., & Forbus, K. (2007). Modeling human-like rates of learning via analogical generalization. Proceedings of Analogies: Integrating Multiple Cognitive Abilities.
Lovett, A., Lockwood, K., & Forbus, K. (2008). Modeling cross-cultural performance on the visual oddity task. Spatial Cognition VI: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5248 . Springer.
[URL]
Lovett, A., Lockwood, K., & Forbus, K. (2008). A computational model of the visual oddity task. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 631-636). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Lovett, A., Sagi, E., & Gentner, D. (2007). Analogy as a mechanism for comparison. In K. -U. Kühnberger, P. König, & P. Ludewig (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Analogies: Integrating Multiple Cognitive Abilities, 5-2007 (pp. 27-30). Osnabrück, Germany: ?

M

Maddox, K., Rapp, D. N., Brion, S., & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Social influences on spatial memory. Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 479-494.
[DOI]
Maguire, M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2006). A unified theory of word learning: Putting verb acquisition in context. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 364-392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maloney, E. A., Ansari, D., & Fugelsang, J. (2011). The effect of mathematics anxiety on the processing of numerical magnitude. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(1), 10-16.
[DOI]
Mandler, J. M. (2010). The spatial foundations of the conceptual system. Language and Cognition, 2(1), 21-44.
[DOI]
Mandler, J. M. (2008). On the birth and growth of concepts. Philosophical Psychology, 21(2), 207-230.
[DOI]
Mandler, J. M. (2005). How to build a baby III: Image-schemas and the transition to verbal thought. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 137 - 163). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Mandler, J. M. & Johnson, N. S. (1976). Some of the thousand words a picture is worth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(5), 529-540.
Mandler, J. M. & Parker, R. E. (1976). Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(1), 38-48.
[DOI]
Mandler, J. M., Seegmiller, D., & Day, J. (1977). On the coding of spatial information. Memory and Cognition, 5(1), 10-16.
[DOI]
Manning, C., Sera, M., & Pick, H. L. Jr. (2002). Understanding how we think about space: An examination of the meaning of English spatial prepositions. In K. R. Coventry & P. L. Olivier (Eds.), Spatial Language: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives (pp. 147-164). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mark, D. M., Freksa, C., Hirtle, S. C., Lloyd, R., & Tversky, B. (1999). Cognitive Models of Geographic Space. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(8), 747-774.
[DOI]
Mattarella-Micke, A. & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Situating math problems: The story matters. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 106-111.
[DOI]
Matuk, C. F. (2008). Animated cladograms: The perception and conception of evolution. Proceedings of the EARLI Special Interest Group Text and Graphics Bi-annual conference: Exploiting the Opportunities: Learning with Textual, Graphical and Multimodal Representations (pp. 100-103). Rotterdam: EARLI.
Matuk, C. F. (2008). Animated cladograms: Interpreting evolution from diagrams. In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, 5223 (pp. 395-397): Springer-Verlag.
[DOI]
Matuk, C. F. & Uttal, D. H. (2008). Entertaining evolution: Understanding science from animations. Proceedings of the 8th international conference for the learning sciences (pp. 93-94): International Society of the Learning Sciences.
May, M. (2006). Raum (Space). In J. Funke & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie: Kognition (pp. 66-74). Gvttingen: Hogrefe.
May, M. & Klatzky, R. L. (2000). Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 169-186.
McCloskey, M. (2001). Spatial representation in mind and brain. In B. Rapp (Ed.), What deficits reveal about the human mind/brain: A handbook of cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 101-132). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
McCloskey, M. & Rapp, B. (2000). Attention-referenced visual representations: Evidence from impaired visual localization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 917-933.
Meilinger, T. (2008). The network of reference frames theory: A synthesis of graphs and cognitive maps. In C. Freksa, N. S. Newcombe, P. Gärdenfors, & S. Wölfl (Eds.), Spatial Cognition VI: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5248 (pp. 344-360). Berlin: Springer.
Meilinger, T., Riecke, B. E., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2007). Orientation Specificity in Long-Term-Memory for Environmental Spaces. Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci) (pp. 479–484).
Melinger, A. & Kita, S. (in press/2007). Conceptualization load triggers gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 473-500.
[DOI]
Mendoza, J. E., Elliott, D., Meegan, D. V., Lyons, J. L., & Welsh, T. N. (2006). The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 413-422.
Millar, S. (2008). Space and Sense. London & New York: Psychology Press.
Millar, S. (2005). Network Models for Haptic Perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 28, 250-265.
Millar, S. (1997). Reading by Touch. London & N.Y.: Routledge.
Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2001). Illusions in reading maps by touch: Reducing distance errors. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 643-657.
Millar, S. (2006). Spatial Processing of Information from Touch and Movement: Implications from and for Neuroscience. In M. A. Heller & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Touch and Blindness: Psychology and Neuroscience (pp. 25-48). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mittelberg, I. (2008). Peircean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and Gesture (pp. 115-154). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Mittelberg, I. (2010). Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions, chapter 14: Advances in Cognitive Linguistics . London: Equinox.
Mittelberg, I. & Waugh, L. R. (2009). Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitivesemiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor, chapter 14 (pp. 329–358). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
[DOI]
Mohler, B. J., Riecke, B. E., Thompson, W. B., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Measuring Vection in a Large Screen Virtual Environment. ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, (APGV) (pp. 103-109).
Montello, D. R., Fabrikant, S. I., Ruocco, M., & Middleton, R. S. (2003). Testing the First Law of Cognitive Geography on Point-Display Spatializations. In W. Kuhn, M. Worboys, & S. Timpf (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory: Foundations of Geographic Information Science. Proceedings of the Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT '03) (pp. 316-331). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
Montello, D. R. (2005). Navigation. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 257-294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Montello, D. R. (2001). Spatial cognition. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 14771-14775). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Montello, D. R., Waller, D., Hegarty, M., & Richardson, A. E. (2004). Spatial memory of real environments, virtual environments, and maps. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Human spatial memory: Remembering where (pp. 251-285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moura, D. & Riecke, B. E. (2009). Is Seeing a Virtual Environment Like Seeing the Real Thing? ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) (pp. 131).

N

Nardi, D., Funk, A., Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2009). Reorientation by Slope Cues in Humans. Cognitive Processing: ICSC 2009 Special Issue, 10(Supplement 2), 260-262.
[DOI]
Nardi, D., Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2011). The World Is Not Flat: Can People Reorient Using Slope? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 354-367.
[DOI]
National Education Association (NEA) (2003). Status of the American Public School Teacher 2000-2001. Washington, D. C.: National Education Association.
Nejasmic, J., Krumnack, A., Bucher, L., & Knauff, M. (2011). Cognitive processes underlying the continuity effect in spatial reasoning. In L. A. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1127-1132): Cognitive Science Society.
Newcombe, N. S. (2007). Psychology's role in math and science. Monitor on Psychology, 38(10), 8.
Newcombe, N. S. & Chiang, N. (2007). Learning geographical information from hypothetical maps. Memory and Cognition, 35(5), 895-909.
[URL]
Newcombe, N. S. & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what and how. Mind, Brain and Education, 4(3), 102–111.
[DOI]
[URL]
Newcombe, N. S., Ratliff, K. R., Shallcross, W., & Twyman, A. D. (2009). Is cognitive modularity necessary in an evolutionary account of development? In L. Tommasi, L. Nadel, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Cognitive biology: Evolutionary and developmental perspectives on mind, brain and behavior, chapter 6: Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology (pp. 105-126). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Newcombe, N. S. & Shipley, T. F. (in press). Thinking about Spatial Thinking: New Typology, New Assessments. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity. Springer.
[URL]
Newcombe, N. S. & Shipley, T. F. (in press). Thinking about Spatial Thinking: New Typology, New Assessments. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity. Springer.
[URL]
Newcombe, N. S., Uttal, D. H., & Sauter, M. G. (in press). Spatial Development. In P. Zelazo (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
[URL]
Nishiguchi, S. (2010). Interpreting Spatial Relational Nouns in Japanese.: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop COSLI'10, 45-48, CEUR-WS.org.
[URL]
Novick, L. R. (2001). Spatial diagrams: Key instruments in the toolbox for thought. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory: 40 (pp. 279-325). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Núñez, R. (2006). Do Real Numbers Really Move? Language, Thought, and Gesture: The Embodied Cognitive Foundations of Mathematics. In R. Hersh (Ed.), 18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics, chapter 9 (pp. 160-181). New York: Springer.
[DOI]

O

O’Ceallaigh, R. & Coventry, K. R. (2008). Meaning construction, spatial language, and past history. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1336-1341). Austin, Texas: Cognitive Science Society.
Oliva, A., Torralba, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2003). Top down control of visual attention in object detection. IEEE Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, 1 (pp. 253-256).
Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Di Matteo, R., Del Gratta, C., De Nicola, A., Ferretti, A., Tartaro, A., Bonomo, L., & Romani, G. L. (2004). Intermodal sensory image generation: An fMRI analysis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. Special issue on "Neuroimaging investigation of mental imagery", 16, 729-752.
[DOI]
Ozyurek, A. & Perniss, P. M. (2011). Event representations in signed languages. In J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (Eds.), Event representations in language and cognition, chapter 5: Language Culture and Cognition 11 (pp. 84-107). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[DOI]

P

Panayi, M. (1999). Today's Stories. In M. Caenepeel, D. Benyon, & D. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Community of the Future, 2nd i3 Annual Conference (pp. 188-94).
Panayi, M. (in press). What, Why, Where & How do children think? SCA: Towards a dynamic model of Spatial Cognition as Action in children. In E. Efthimiou & G. Kouroupetroglou (Eds.), Proceedings of The 9th International Gesture Workshop: Gesture in Embodied Communication and Human-Computer Interaction (GW 2011) (pp. 133-137): Spring-Verlag.
Panayi, M. & Roy, D. M. (1998). BodyTek: Technology enhanced interactive physical theatre for people with cognitive impairment. Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Multimedia: Technologies for interactive movies (pp. 35 - 38).
[DOI]
Panayi, M. & Roy, D. M. (2005). Spatial Cognition in Action: SCA Model Children's Gestural Imagery in Action. In A. Cangelosi, G. Bugmann, & R. Borisyuk (Eds.), Modeling Language, Cognition and Action: Proceedings of the Ninth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop, Progress in Neural Processing vol. 16. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Co.
[DOI]
Panayi, M., Roy, D. M., & Richardson, J. (1999). Stimulating Research into Gestural Human Machine Interaction. Proceedings of the International Gesture Workshop on Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 317-331). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
Panayi, M. & Roy, D. M. (2012). Spatial Cognition in Action: SCA. In N. Steel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 3154-3166). Springer-Verlag.
[DOI]
Panayi, M., van de Velde, W., Roy, D. M., Cakmakci, O., De Paepe, K., & Bernsen, N. O. (1999). /aigaion2/index.php/publications/show/1291

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Uninitialized string offset: -1

Filename: helpers/publication_helper.php

Line Number: 640

. Proceedings of the first international symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, 1707 (pp. 320-323): Spring-Verlag.
[DOI]
Pani, J. R. (2000). Cognitive description and change blindness. Visual Cognition: Change Blindness and Visual Memory, D. L. Simons (ed.). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press, 107-126 (special issue).
Pani, J. R. (1999). Descriptions of orientation and structure in perception and physical reasoning. Ecological Approaches to Cognition: Essays in honor of Ulric Neisser, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 59-95.
Pani, J. R. (1997). Descriptions of orientation in physical reasoning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 121-126.
[DOI]
Papafragou, A. & Selimis, S. (2010). Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 224-260.
[DOI]
Papafragou, A. & Selimis, S. (2010). Lexical and structural biases in the acquisition of motion verbs. Language Learning and Development, 6(2), 87-115.
[DOI]
Parish, J., Ma, W., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (in press). A world of relations: Relational words. In B. Malt (Ed.), Words and the world: How words capture the human experience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Park, J. A., Kim, Y. S., & Cho, J. Y. (2006). Visual Reasoning as a Critical Attribute in Design Creativity. Proceeding of International Design Research Symposium, Korea.
Pecher, D., Van Dantzig, S., Zwaan, R. A., & Zeelenberg, R. (2009). Language comprehenders retain implied shape and orientation of objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1108-1114.
Pellicano, E., Smith, A. D., Cristino, F., Briscoe, J., Hood, B. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2011). Children with autism are neither systematic nor optimal foragers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 108 (pp. 421-426).
[DOI]
Perniss, P. M., Zwitserlood, I., & Ozyurek, A. (2011). Does space structure spatial language? Linguistic encoding of space in sign languages. In L. A. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1595-1600): Cognitive Science Society.
Péruch, P., Belingard, L., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2000). Transfer of spatial knowledge from virtual to real environments. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition II: Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1849 (pp. 253-264). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Péruch, P., Gaunet, F., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Loomis, J. (2000). Understanding and learning virtual spaces. In R. M. Kitchin & S. Freundschuh (Eds.), Cognitive Mapping: Past, Present and Future (pp. 108-124). London: Routledge.
Peters, M., Chisholm, P., & Laeng, B. (1995). Spatial ability, student gender and academic performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 69-73.
Peterson, M. A. & Gibson, B. S. (1991). Directing spatial attention within an object: Altering the functional equivalence of shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(1), 170-182.
[DOI]
Philbeck, J. W., Klatzky, R. L., Behrmann, M., Loomis, J. M., & Goodridge, J. (2001). Active control of locomotion facilitates non-visual navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 141-153.
[URL]
Philbeck, J. W. & Loomis, J. M. (1997). Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 72-85.
[URL]
Pick, H. L. Jr. (2007). History of research on blindness and brain plasticity. In J. J. Rieser, D. H. Ashmead, F. Ebner, & A. L. Corn (Eds.), Blindness and Brain Plasticity in Navigation and Object Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pick, H. L. Jr., Rieser, J. J., Wagner, D., & Garing, A. E. (1999). The recalibration of rotational locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1179-1188.
Ping, R., Ratliff, K. R., Hickey, E., & Levine, S. C. (2011). Using manual rotation and gesture to improve mental rotation in preschoolers. In L. A. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 459-464). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Plank, M., Müller, H. J., Onton, J., Makeig, S., & Gramann, K. (2009). VR as promising tool for experimental research on human spatial navigation. In S. Welke, H. Kolrep, & M. Roetting (Eds.), Biophysiologische Interfaces in der Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion: Fortschritt-Berichte VDI 22 (pp. 50-62).
Plank, M., Onton, J., Mueller, H., Makeig, S., & Gramann, K. (2010). Human EEG correlates of egocentric and allocentric path integration. In C. Hölscher, T. F. Shipley, M. Olivetti Belardinelli, J. Bateman, & N. S. Newcombe (Eds.), Spatial Cognition VII: Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 6222 (pp. 191-206). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Plumert, J. M. & Spencer, J. P. (2007). The emerging spatial mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pribyl, J. R. & Bodner, G. M. (1987). Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry: A study of four organic courses. Journal of research in science teaching, 24(3), 229-240.
[DOI]
Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Distance perception. Current Directions in Psychological Research, 15, 131-135.
Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 1, 110-122.
Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, M., & Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(4), 409–428.
Pruden, S. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2008). Current events: How infants parse events for language. In T. F. Shipley & J. Zachs (Eds.), Understanding Events (pp. 160-193). New York: Oxford University Press.
Pruden, S. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2008). Current events: How infants parse the world and events for language. In T. F. Shipley & J. M. Zacks (Eds.), Understanding events: How humans see, represent, and act on events. New York: Oxford University Press.
[DOI]
Pruden, S. M., Shallcross, W., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2008). Foundations of verb learning: Comparison helps infants abstract event components. In H. Chan, H. Jacob, & E. Kapia (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 2 (pp. 402-414). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Pulverman, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Pruden, S. M., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2006). Precursors to verb learning: Infant attention to manner and path. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 134-160). New York: Oxford University Press.

Q


R

Ragni, M., Knauff, M., & Nebel, B. (2005). A computational model for spatial reasoning with mental models. In B. G. Bara & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1797-1802). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[URL]
Rapp, D. N. & Kurby, C. A. (2008). The 'ins' and 'outs' of learning: Internal representations and external visualizations. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education, chapter 2: Models and Modeling in Science Education 3 (pp. 29-52). New York: Springer.
Rapp, D. N. & Taylor, H. A. (2004). Interactive dimensions in the construction of mental representations for text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(5), 988-1001.
[DOI]
Rapp, D. N. & Uttal, D. H. (2006). Understanding and enhancing visualizations: Two models of collaboration between earth science and cognitive science. In C. A. Manduca & D. W. Mogk (Eds.), Earth and Mind: How Geologists Think and Learn About the Earth (pp. 121-127). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America Press.
[DOI]
[URL]
Ratliff, K. R., McGinnis, C. R., & Levinson, S.C. (2010). The development and assessment of cross-sectioning ability in young children. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Reed, S. K. (2010). Thinking visually. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive architectures for multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 87-98.
[DOI]
Reed, S. K. (2005). From research to practice and back: The Animation Tutor project. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 55-82.
[DOI]
Reed, S. K. & Hoffman, B. (2010). Animation Tutor. [Instructional software]. New York: Taylor & Francis.
[URL]
Reed, S. K. (2008). Manipulating multimedia materials. In R. Z. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive effects of multimedia learning (pp. 51-66). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
[URL]
Regier, T., Kay, P., & Khetarpal, N. (2007). Color naming reflects optimal partitions of color space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 104(4), 1436-1441.
[DOI]
[URL]
Regier, T., Khetarpal, N., & Majid, A. (2011). Inferring conceptual structure from cross-language data. In L. A. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1488). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Regier, T. (in press). Computational approaches to language and thought. In M. J. Spivey, M. F. Joanisse, & K. McRae (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reilly, J., Levine, S. C., Nass, R., & Stiles, J. (2008). Brain Plasticity: Evidence from children with prenatal brain injury. In J. Reed & J. Warner-Rogers (Eds.), Child Neuropsychology: Concepts, Theory, and Practice. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Reynolds, S. J., Johnson, J. K., Piburn, M. D., Leedy, D. E, Coyan, J. A., & Busch, M. M. (2005). Visualization in undergraduate geology courses. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in Science Education: Models and Modeling in Science Education, chapter 12: 1 (Section C) (pp. 253-266). Springer.
[DOI]
Reynolds, S. J., Piburn, M. D., Johnson, J. K., Leedy, D. E, Coyan, J. A., & Busch, M. M. (2004). The Hidden Earth Curriculum Project: Spatial Visualization in Undergraduate Geoscience Courses. Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education (pp. 141-145). Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
[URL]
Reynolds, S. J., Piburn, M. D., Leedy, D. E, McAuliffe, C., Birk, J., & Johnson, J. K. (2006). The Hidden Earth: Interactive, computer-based modules for geoscience learning. In C. A. Manduca & D. W. Mogk (Eds.), Earth and Mind: How Geologists Think and Learn About the Earth: GSA Special Papers 413 (pp. 157-170). Geological Society of America.
[DOI]
Richard, A. M., Lee, H., & Vecera, S. P. (2008). Attentional spreading in object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(4), 842-853.
Richland, L. & McDonough, I. (2010). Learning by analogy: Discriminating between potential analogs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 28-43.
[DOI]
Richter, K. -F. & Duckham, M. (2008). Simplest Instructions: Finding Easy-to-Describe Routes for Navigation. In T. J. Cova, H. J. Miller, K. Beard, A. U. Frank, & M. F. Goodchild (Eds.), Geographic Information Science - 5th International Conference, GIScience (pp. 274-289): Springer.
[DOI]
[URL]
Richter, K. -F., Tomko, M., & Winter, S. (2008). A Dialog-Driven Process of Generating Route Directions. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32(3), 233-245.
[DOI]
Richter, K. -F. & Winter, S. (2011). Hierarchical Representation of Indoor Spaces. Environment and Planning B, 38(6), 1052-1070.
[DOI]
Richter, K. -F. (2007). A Uniform Handling of Different Landmark Types in Route Direction. In S. Winter, M. Duckham, L. Kulik, & B. Kuipers (Eds.), International Conference COSIT: Spatial Information Theory (pp. 373-389). Berlin: Springer.
[URL]
Riecke, B. E. (2006). Simple User-Generated Motion Cueing can Enhance Self-Motion Perception (Vection) in Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST) (pp. 104–107): ACM Press.
[DOI]
Riecke, B. E., Behbahani, P. A., & Shaw, C. D. (2009). Display Size does not Affect Egocentric Distance Perception of Naturalistic Stimuli. ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) (pp. 15-18).
[DOI]
Riecke, B. E., Feuereissen, D., & Rieser, J. J. (2008). Auditory self-motion illusions ("circular vection") can be facilitated by vibrations and the potential for actual motion. ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) (pp. 147-154).
[DOI]
Riecke, B. E. & McNamara, T. P. (2007). An Integrative Theory of Spatial Orientation in the Immediate Environment. Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci) (pp. 1845).
Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Avraamides, M. N., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Scene Consistency and Spatial Presence Increase the Sensation of Self-Motion in Virtual Reality. 2nd ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) (pp. 111-118).
[DOI]
Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Perceiving Simulated Ego-Motions in Virtual Reality - Comparing Large Screen Displays with HMDs. In B. E. Rogowitz, T. N. Pappas, & S. J. Daly (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE - VALVE: Vision, Action, and Locomotion in Virtual (and Real) Environments, 5666 (pp. 344-355).
[DOI]
Riecke, B. E., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Spatial updating in real and virtual environments - contribution and interaction of visual and vestibular cues. ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) (pp. 9-17).
[DOI]
Riecke, B. E. & Wiener, J. M. (2006). Point-to-origin experiments in VR revealed novel qualitative errors in visual path integration. 3rd ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) (pp. 156).
[DOI]
Rieser, J. J. & Pick, H. L. Jr. (2002). The Perception and Representation of Human Locomotion. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance 19 (pp. 177-193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rinck, M. & Denis, M. (2004). The metrics of spatial distance traversed during mental imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1211-1218.
[DOI]
Robertson, L. C. (2004). Space, Objects, Minds and Brains. New York: Psychology Press (Francis & Taylor).
Robertson, L. C. (2003). Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(2), 93-102.
[DOI]
Robertson, L. C. & Brooks, J. L. (2006). Visual search and spatial deficits. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 851-862.
[DOI]
Robertson, L. C. & Kim, M. S. (1998). Effects of perceived space on spatial attention. Psychological Science, 10(1), 76-79.
[DOI]
[URL]
Robin, N. & Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Relational complexity and the functions of the prefrontal cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 987-997). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roy, D. M., Panayi, M., Foulds, R., Fawcus, R., Erenshteyn, R., & Harwin, W. (1994). Computer Recognition of Gestures for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Proceedings of Sixth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC).
Ruddle, R. A. (2009). How do people find information on a familiar website? Proceedings of the 23rd BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI'09) (pp. 262-268).
[URL]
Ruddle, R. A. (2008). Generating trails automatically, to aid navigation when you revisit an environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 17(6), 562-574.
[DOI]
[URL]
Ruddle, R. A. & Lessels, S. (2009). The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 16(1), 1-18.
[DOI]
[URL]

S

Sampaio, C. & Wang, R. F. (2009). Category-based errors and the accessibility of unbiased spatial memories: A retrieval model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35(5), 1331-1337.
[URL]
Sampanes, A. C., Tseng, P., & Bridgeman, B. (2008). The role of gist in scene recognition. Vision Research, 48(21), 2275-2283.
[DOI]
[URL]
Sanchez, C. A & Wiley, J. (2007). Spatial Abilities and Learning Complex Scientific Topics. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Santangelo, V., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., & Spence, C. (2007). The suppression of reflexive visual and auditory orienting when voluntary attention is engaged. Journal of experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1), 137-148.
[DOI]
Sargent, J., Dopkins, S., Philbeck, J. W., & Chichka, D. (2010). Chunking in Spatial Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 576-589.
[DOI]
Sargent, J., Dopkins, S., Philbeck, J. W., & Modarres, R. (2008). Spatial memory during progressive disorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34(3), 602-615.
[DOI]
Sauter, M. G., Reynolds, E., & Uttal, D. H. (2011, April). "Drawing" conclusions about spatial development. Poster presented at the 2011 Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Schaal, A., Uttal, D. H., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2005, May). Children's gestures provide insight into their mental representation of space. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Psychological Association, Chicago
Schiff, S., Bardi, L., Basso, D., & Mapelli, D. (2011). Timing spatial conflict within the parietal cortex: a TMS study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(12), 3998-4007.
[DOI]
Schinazi, V., Epstein, R., Nardi, D., Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2009, November). The acquisition of spatial knowledge in an unfamiliar campus environment. Proceeding of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society.
Schmid, F., Richter, K. -F., & Peters, D. (2010). Route Aware Maps: Multigranular Wayfinding Assistance. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 10(2), 184-206.
[DOI]
Schultheis, H., Bertel, S., Barkowsky, T., & Seifert, I. (2007). The Spatial and the Visual in Mental Spatial Reasoning: An Ill-Posed Distinction. In T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat, & D. R. Montello (Eds.), Spatial Cognition V - Reasoning, Action, Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4387 (pp. 191-209). Springer.
[DOI]
Schultheis, H. (2007). A Control Perspective on Imaginal Perspective Taking. In R. Lewis, T Polk, & J Laird (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on cognitive modeling (ICCM 2007) (pp. 19-24).
Schwering, A., Bauer, C., Đorčeva, I., Gust, H., Krumnack, U., & Kühnberger, K. -U. (2009). The Impact of Gestalt Principles on Solving Geometric Proportional Analogies. Proceedings of the 2nd International Analogy Conference (ANALOGY09), Sofia, Bulgaria (pp. 404-413).
Schwering, A., Kühnberger, K. -U., Krumnack, U., & Gust, H. (2009). Spatial Cognition of Geometric Figures in the Context of Proportional Analogies. Proceedings of the Conference on Spatial Information Theory (Cosit 09),, 5756 (pp. 18-35): Springer.
[DOI]
Shah, P. & Carpenter, P. A. (1995). Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 43-61.
[DOI]
Shelton, A. L. & Marchette, S. A. (2010). Where do you think you are? Effects of conceptual current position on spatial memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36(3), 686-698.
[DOI]
Shelton, A. L. & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43(4), 274-310.
[DOI]
Shi, H., Ross, R., Tenbrink, T., & Bateman, J. (2010). Modelling Illocutionary Structure: Combining Empirical Studies with Formal Model Analysis. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), 11th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, 6008 (pp. 340-353). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Shi, H. & Tenbrink, T. (2009). Telling Rolland where to go: HRI dialogues on route navigation. In K. R. Coventry, T. Tenbrink, & J. Bateman (Eds.), Spatial Language and Dialogue (pp. 177-190). Oxford University Press.
[DOI]
Shimojima, A. (1999). The Linguistic-Graphic Distinction: Exploring Alternatives. Artificial Intelligence Review, 13(4), 313-335.
[DOI]
Shimojima, A. (1996). Operational Constraints in Diagrammatic Reasoning. In G. Allwein & J. Barwise (Eds.), Logical Reasoning with Diagrams (pp. 27-48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shimojima, A. & Katagiri, Y. (2008). An Eye-Tracking Study of Exploitations of Spatial Constraints in Diagrammatic Reasoning. Diagrammatic Representation and Inference: Fifth International Conference, Diagrams 2008, Proceedings, 5223 (pp. 74-88): Springer, Berlin.
[DOI]
Shipley, T. F. (2009). Spatial Visualization and the Role of Working Memory. Proceeding of Geological Society of America Annual Meeting.
Shipley, T. F. (2008). An invitation to an event. In T. F. Shipley & J. M. Zacks (Eds.), Understanding Events: From Perception to Action. Oxford University Press.
Sibley, D. F. (2005). Visual abilities and misconceptions about plate tectonics. Journal Geoscience Education, 53(4), 471-477.
Simms, N. & Gentner, D. (2009). Relational language and inhibitory control in the development of analogical ability. In B. Kokinov, K. J. Holyoak, & D. Gentner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Analogy: New Frontiers in Analogy Research (pp. 414-422): NBU Press.
Simms, N. & Gentner, D. (2008). Spatial language and landmark use: Can 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds find the middle? In V. M. Sloutsky, B. C. Love, & K. McRae (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 191-196). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Smith, A. D. & Cohen, G. (2008). Memory for places: routes, maps, and object locations. In M. Conway & G. Cohen (Eds.), Memory in the Real World (pp. 173-206). Psychology Press.
Smith, A. D., Hood, B. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2010). Probabilistic cuing in large-scale environmental search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 605-618.
[DOI]
Smith, S. P. & Hart, J. (2006). Evaluating distributed cognitive resources for wayfinding in a desktop virtual environment. IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI 2006) (pp. 3-10).
[DOI]
[URL]
Spaepen, E., Coppola, M., Spelke, E., Carey, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Number without a language model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 8 (pp. 3163-3168).
[DOI]
Spence, C. & Driver, J. (2004). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spence, C., Pavani, F., Maravita, A., & Holmes, N. P. (2008). Multisensory contributions to the representation of peripersonal space in humans: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. In M. Lin (Ed.), Haptic rendering: Foundations, algorithms, and applications. Wellesley, MA: AK Peters, Ltd.
Spence, I. (1990). Visual psychophysics of simple graphical elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception, 16, 683-692.
[DOI]
Spence, I. & Krizel, P. (1994). Children's perception of proportion in graphs. Child Development, 65(4), 1193-1213.
[DOI]
[URL]
Spence, I. & Lewandowsky, S. (1989). Robust multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 54(3), 501-513.
Spetch, M. L. & Kelly, D. M. (2006). Comparative spatial cognition: Processes in landmark and surface-based place finding. In E. A. Wasserman & T. R. Zentall (Eds.), Comparative Cognition: Experimental Explorations of Animal Intelligence (pp. 210-228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[URL]
Spetch, M. L. & Parent, M. B. (2006). Age and sex differences in children's spatial search strategies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 807-812.
Spiers, H. J. & Maguire, E. A. (2008). The dynamic nature of cognition during wayfinding. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(3), 232-249.
[DOI]
Srinivas, S. (2007). Influence of Affect on Wayfinding. Conference on Spatial Information Theory, Melbourne, Australia: Doctoral Colloquium
Srinivas, S. & Hirtle, S. C. (2006). Knowledge Based Schematization of Route Directions. In T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat, & D. R. Montello (Eds.), Spatial Cognition V: Reasoning, action, interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4387 (pp. 346-364). Springer-Verlag.
[DOI]
Stiles, J., Nass, R., Levine, S. C., Moses, P., & Reilly, J. (2009). Perinatal stroke: Effects and outcomes. In K. O. Yeates, M. D. Ris, H. G. Taylor, & B. Pennington (Eds.), Pediatric Neuropsychology Research, Theory, and Practice. New York: The Guildford Press.
Stollinski, R., Schwering, A., Kühnberger, K. -U., & Krumnack, U. (2009). Structural Alignment of Visual Stimuli Influences Human Object Categorization. Proceedings of the 2nd International Analogy Conference (ANALOGY09), Sofia, Bulgaria (pp. 433-442).
[URL]
Stouffs, R., Kooistra, J., & Tunçer, B. (2004). Metadata as a means for correspondence on digital media. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction: special issue: Digital Media Libraries, 9, 129-142.
Stouffs, R., Kooistra, J., Tunçer, B., & Akar, E. (2005). Design Communication and Collaboration. In H. Achten, K. Dorst, P. J. Stappers, & B. de Vries (Eds.), Design Research in the Netherlands (pp. 85-94). Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture.
[URL]
Stouffs, R., Tunçer, B., Groesbeek, E. J., Kooistra, J., & Sjoer, E. (2005). The use of metadata as a means to improve the quality of design: Results from education. In A. Bhatt (Ed.), CAADRIA '05: Proceedings of the 10th Int. Conf. on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, 2 (pp. 503-509).
Sutton, J. E. (2009). What is geometric information and how do animals use it? Behavioural Processes, 80(3), 339-343.
[DOI]
Sutton, J. E., Joanisse, M. F., & Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Spinning in the scanner: Neural correlates of virtual reorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36(5), 1097–1107.
[DOI]
[URL]

T

Takayama, K. (2005). Teaching visualizing the science of genomics. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in Science Education (pp. 217-251). Dordrecht: Springer.
Tartre, L. A. (1990). Spatial orientation skill and mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 216- 229.
[DOI]
Tartre, L. A. (1990). Spatial skills, gender and mathematics. In E. Fennema & G. Leder (Eds.), Mathematics and Gender (pp. 27- 59). New York: Teachers' College Press.
Taylor, H. A., Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, S. (in press). Wayfinding and navigation: Mental representation and implications for navigational system design. In C. M. Carswell (Ed.), Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics: 4 . Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Taylor, H. A. & Rapp, D. N. (2004). Where is the donut? Factors influencing spatial reference frame use. Cognitive Processing: The International Quarterly of Cognitive Science, 5(3), 175-188.
[DOI]
Taylor, H. A. & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Updating human spatial memory. In M. F. Brown & R. G. Cook (Eds.), Animal Spatial Cognition: Comparative, Neural, and Computational Approaches, chapter 2.
[URL]
Taylor, H. A., Tenbrink, T., & Sorrows, M. E. (2011). Let's Go for a Run: Planning Routes to Remember. In L. A. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), 33rd annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2758-2763). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Tenbrink, T. (2011). Reference frames of space and time in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 704-722.
[DOI]
Tenbrink, T., Bergmann, E., & Konieczny, L. (2011). Wayfinding and description strategies in an unfamiliar complex building. In L. A. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), 33rd annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1262-1267). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Tenbrink, T. (2009). Identifying objects in English and German: A contrastive linguistic analysis of spatial reference. In K. R. Coventry, T. Tenbrink, & J. Bateman (Eds.), Spatial Language and Dialogue (pp. 104-118). Oxford University Press.
[DOI]
Tenbrink, T. & Kuhn, W. (2011). A model of spatial reference frames in language. In M. J. Egenhofer, N. A. Giudice, R. Moratz, & M. Worboys (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2011), 6899 (pp. 371-390). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Tenbrink, T. & Seifert, I. (2011). Conceptual Layers and Strategies in Tour Planning. Cognitive Processing, 12(1), 109–125.
[DOI]
Tenbrink, T. & Winter, S. (2009). Variable Granularity in Route Directions. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 9(1), 64 – 93.
[DOI]
Teramoto, W. & Riecke, B. E. (2007). Physical self-motion facilitates object recognition, but does not enable view-independence. ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (pp. 142).
[DOI]
Terlecki, M. S. (2008). The effects of long-term practice and training on mental rotation. Saarbrucken, Deutschland: Verlag VDM Publishing.
Terlecki, M. S. (2006, 2007, 2008). Can you see it? Exercises in visualization. Workshop presented at the American Association of University Women, “Discover the future: A science and math extravaganza for students in grades 5 to 7, showcasing women in math and science professions”, North Wales, PA.
Terlecki, M. S. (2005, March). Gender differences in math and science: Myth or reality? Symposium presented at the Educational Testing Service (ETS) Roundtable, Princeton, NJ.
Terlecki, M. S. & Newcombe, N. S. (2005, October). The effects of long-term practice and training on mental rotation. Poster presented at the Psychonomic Society Conference, Toronto, Canada.
Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2011). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology; Special Issue Celebrating 25 years of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(S1), 253-271.
[DOI]
Thompson-Schill, S. L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997, December). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United State of America (PNAS), 94 (pp. 14792-14797).
Thomson, R. & Davies, J. (2009). Distance Estimation as a Process of Generating Ad-Hoc Metrical Systems. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2932-2937). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Cognitive Science Society, Inc.
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary Mental Abilities. Primary Mental Abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tomai, E., Lovett, A., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2005). A Structure Mapping Model for Solving Geometric Analogy Problems. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2190-2195). Stressa, Italy: Cognitive Science Society, Inc.
[URL]
Tomko, M. & Winter, S. (2009). Pragmatic Construction of Destination Descriptions for Urban Environments. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 9(1), 1-29.
[DOI]
Tomko, M., Winter, S., & Claramunt, C. (2008). Experiential Hierarchies of Streets. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32(1), 41-52.
[DOI]
Tsal, Y. & Kolbert, L. (1985). Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 37(1), 25-37.
[DOI]
Turnbull, D. (1994). Maps are territories, science is an atlas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tversky, B., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Lee, P. U., Hanrahan, P., Phan, D., Stolte, C., & Daniel, M. -P. (2007). Cognitive design principles for automated generation of visualizations. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition: From research to cognitive technology, chapter 3. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[URL]
Tversky, B. (2007). Gestalts of thought. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Visual thought (pp. 155-163). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
[URL]
Tversky, B. (2007). Communicating with diagrams and gestures. In B. Choksi & C. Najaran (Eds.), Research trends in science, technology, and mathematics education. Mumbai, India: Macmillan.
[URL]
Tversky, B. (2005). Some ways images express and promote thought. In P. Grialou, G. Longo, & M. Okada (Eds.), Image and reasoning (pp. 15-29). Tokyo: Keio University Press.
[URL]
Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lee, P. U., & Daniel, M. -P. (2009). Explanations in gesture, diagram, and word. In K. R. Coventry, T. Tenbrink, & J. Bateman (Eds.), Spatial Language and Dialogue, chapter 9 (pp. 119-131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[DOI]
[URL]
Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lozano, S. C., MacKenzie, R., & Morrison, J. (2007). Enriching animations. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, B. (2005). Visuospatial reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, chapter 10 (pp. 209-249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[DOI]
[URL]
Tversky, B. (2005). Visuospatial reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), Handbook of Reasoniong, chapter 10 (pp. 209-249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, B. (2008). Spatial cognition: Embodied and Situated. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, chapter 12 (pp. 2010-216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, B. (2005). Functional significance of visuospatial representations. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 1-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[URL]

U

Ullman, S. (1984). Visual routines. Cognition, 18, 97-159.
Uttal, D. H. (2012). Spatial Cognition and STEM education: When, why, and how. Colloquium, University of California, Santa Barbara
Uttal, D. H. (2011). [title not available]. Invited Speaker, OECD conference on the Science of Learning, Paris, France.
Uttal, D. H. (2011). [title not available]. Colloquium, Carnegie-Mellon University.
Uttal, D. H. & Cohen, C. A. (in press). Spatial abilities and STEM education: What, when, and how. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation.
Uttal, D. H. (in press). Maps and spatial thinking: Developmental, cultural and historical perspectives. In L. Namy (Ed.), Symbols and thought: Proceedings of the Emory cognition conference. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Uttal, D. H. & O'Doherty, K. (2008). Understanding visualizations: A developmental approach with implications for science education. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education, chapter 3 (pp. 53-72). New York: Springer.

V

Van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Approach and Avoidance as Action Effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(9), 1298-1306.
[DOI]
Van Dantzig, S., Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D. (2009). Unconstraining theories of embodied cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 345-351.
[DOI]
Varley, R., Klessinger, N., Romanowski, C., & Siegal, M. (2005, March). Agrammatic but numerate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 102 (pp. 3519-3524).
[DOI]
Vasilyeva, M. & Huttenlocher, J. (2004). Early development of scaling ability. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 682-690.
[DOI]
Vecchi, T. (2001). Visuo-spatial processing in congenitally blind people: Is there a gender-related preference? Personality and Individual Differences, 30(8), 1361-1370.
[DOI]
T. Vecchi & G. Bottini (Eds.). (2006). Imagery and spatial cognition: Methods, models and clinical assessment. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, The Netherlands/USA: John Benjamins Publishers.
von der Heyde, M. & Riecke, B. E. (2002). Embedding presence-related terminology in a logical and functional model. In F. Gouveia (Ed.), Proceedings of Fifth Annual Workshop Presence (pp. 37-52).
Vorwerg, C. & Tenbrink, T. (2007). Discourse factors influencing spatial descriptions in English and German. In T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat, & D. R. Montello (Eds.), Spatial Cognition V: Reasoning, Action, Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4387 (pp. 470–488). Berlin: Springer.
[DOI]
Vosmik, J. R. & Presson, C. C. (2004). Children's response to natural map misalignment during wayfinding. Journal of Cognition & Development, 5(3), 317-336.
[DOI]
Voyer, D. (1995). Effect of practice on laterality in a mental rotation task. Brain and Cognition, 29(3), 326-335.
[DOI]
Voyer, D. & Bryden, M. P. (1993). Masking and laterality effects on a lateralized rod-and-frame test. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(1), 26-37.
[DOI]
Voyer, D. & Doyle, R. A. (2010). Item type and gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 469-472.
[DOI]
Voyer, D. & Doyle, R. A. (2010). Item Type and Gender Differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 469–472.
[DOI]
Voyer, D. & Hou, J. (2006). Type of items and the magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(2), 91-100.
[DOI]

W

Wagner, L., Yocom, A. M., & Greene-Havas, M. (2008). Children's Understanding of Directed Motion Events in an Imitation Choice Task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100(4), 264-275.
[DOI]
[URL]
Waller, D., Beall, A., & Loomis, J. M. (2004). Using virtual environments to assess directional knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 105-116.
[DOI]
Waller, D. & Hodgson, E. (2006). Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32(4), 867-882.
[DOI]
Waller, D., Loomis, J. M., & Steck, S. D. (2003). Inertial cues do not enhance knowledge of environmental layout. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 987-993.
J. Wang, K. Broelemann, M. Chipofya, A. Schwering, & J. O. Wallgrün (Eds.). (2011). Understanding and Processing Sketch Maps – Proceedings of the COSIT 2011 Workshop. Understanding and Processing Sketch Maps – Proceedings of the COSIT 2011 Workshop.: IOS Press.
Wang, J., Mülligann, C., & Schwering, A. (2011). An Empirical Study on Relevant Aspects for Sketch Map Alignment. Proceedings of the 14th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1 (pp. 497-518).
[DOI]
Wang, J. & Schwering, A. (2009). The Accuracy of Sketched Spatial Relations: How Cognitive Errors Influence Sketch Representation. In T. Tenbrink & S. Winter (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop Presenting Spatial Information: Granularity, Relevance, and Integration, held in conjunction with the Conference on Spatial Information Theory (pp. 40-47): SFB/TR8 and University of Melbourne.
Wang, R. F. (2007). Spatial processing and view-dependent representations. In F. W. Mast & L. Jäncke (Eds.), Spatial Processing in Navigation, Imagery, and Perception, chapter 4 (pp. 49-65). Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
[DOI]
Wang, R. F. & Spelke, E. (2002). Human spatial representation: Insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(9), 376-382.
[DOI]
Ware, E. A., Uttal, D. H., & DeLoache, J. S. (2010). Everyday Scale Errors. Developmental Science, 13(1), 28-36.
[DOI]
[URL]
Waters, W. & Winter, S. (2011). A Wayfinding Aid to Increase Navigator Independence. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 1(3), 103-122.
[DOI]
Weckbacher, L. M. (2007). The role of visualization in geometric problem solving (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara). The role of visualization in geometric problem solving.
Weckbacher, L. M. (2006). The role of spatial activities in gifted youths' spatial understanding (Masters thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara). The role of spatial activities in gifted youths' spatial understanding.
Weckbacher, L. M. & Okamoto, Y. (2009). Exploring the relation between spatial Experience and spatial ability among high academic achievers. Poster presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California
Welsh, T. N. & Pratt, J. (2008). Actions modulate attentional capture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(7), 968-976.
[DOI]
Wetzel, J. (2008). Design Buddy: Sketch-Understanding Software as a Tool for Engineering Design Education. Poster presented at 2008 inter-Science of Learning Centers Conference, Pittsburgh, PA
Wetzel, J. & Forbus, K. (2010). Design Buddy: Providing Feedback for Sketched Multi-Modal Causal Explanations. Proceedings of the 24th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning.
[URL]
Wetzel, J. & Forbus, K. (2009, February). Automated Critique of Engineering Design Explanations. Poster presented at Second Annual Inter-Science of Learning Center Conference, Seattle, WA
Wetzel, J. & Forbus, K. (2009). Automated Critique of Sketched Designs in Engineering. Proceedings of the 23rd International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning.
[URL]
Wetzel, J. & Forbus, K. (2009). Automated Critique of Sketched Mechanisms. Proceedings of the Twenty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (pp. 185-190).
[URL]
Wetzel, J. & Forbus, K. (2008). Integrating Open-Domain Sketch Understanding with Qualitative Two-Dimensional Rigid-Body Mechanics. Proceedings of the 22nd International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning.
[URL]
Wiener, J. M., Shettleworth, S., Bingman, V. P., Cheng, K., Healy, S., Jacobs, L. F., Jeffery, K. J., Mallot, H. A., Menzel, R., & Newcombe, N. S. (2011). Animal Navigation: A synthesis. In R. Menzel & J. Fischer (Eds.), Animal Thinking: Contemporary Issues in Comparative Cognition, chapter 5: Strüngmann Forum Report [http://www.esforum.de] 8 (pp. 51-76). Cambridge: MIT Press.
[URL]
Wiener, J. M. & Tenbrink, T. (2008). Traveling salesman problem: The human case. Künstliche Intelligenz: KI und Kognition, 18-22.
Wiener, J. M., Tenbrink, T., Henschel, J., & Hölscher, C. (2008). Situated and Prospective Path Planning: Route Choice in an Urban Environment. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 851-856).
Wiley, J. (2003). Cognitive and educational implications of visually-rich media: Images and imagination. In M. Hocks & M. Kendrick (Eds.), Eloquent images: Word and Image in the Age of New Media, chapter 9. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[URL]
Winter, S. (2012). Indoor Spatial Information. International Journal of 3-D Information Modelling, 1(1), 25-42.
[DOI]
Winter, S. (2009). Spatial Intelligence: Ready for a Challenge? Spatial Cognition and Computation, 9(2), 138-151.
[DOI]
Winter, S., Tomko, M., & Sester, M. (2008). Landmark Hierarchies in Context. Environment and Planning B, 35(3), 381-398.
[DOI]
Wolbers, T. & Hegarty, M. (2010). What determines our navigational abilities? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 138–146.
[DOI]
Wolter, D., Freksa, C., & Latecki, L. J. (2008). Towards a Generalization of Self-Localization. In M. E. Jefferies & W. K. Yeap (Eds.), Robot and Cognitive Approaches to Spatial Mapping: Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics 38 . Springer.
Wong, C. K., Schmidt, J., & Yeap, W. K. (2007). Using a Mobile Robot for Cognitive Mapping. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (pp. 2243-2248): Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
[URL]
Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: Guilford Press.
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
[URL]
Wright, R., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Newcombe, N. S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Training generalized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(4), 763-771.
[DOI]

X

Xu, Y. & Nakayama, K. (2007). Visual short-term memory benefit for objects on different 3D surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 653-662.
[DOI]

Y

Yang, S. & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Seeing and doing: Ability to act moderates orientation effects in object perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(4), 639-648.
[DOI]
Yeap, W. K. & Jefferies, M. E. (2000). On early cognitive mapping. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(2), 85-116.
[DOI]
Yeap, W. K. & Jefferies, M. E. (1999). Computing a representation of the local environment. Artificial Intelligence, 107(2), 219-263.
[DOI]
Yeap, W. K. (2007). From Spatial Perception to Cognitive Maps: How is the flow of information controlled? In H. Schultheis, T. Barkowsky, B. Kuipers, & B. Hommel (Eds.), Control Mechanisms for Spatial Knowledge Processing in Cognitive/Intelligent Systems. AAAI Press.
[URL]
Yin, P., Chang, M. D., & Forbus, K. (2010). Sketch-based Spatial Reasoning in Geologic Interpretation. Proceedings of the 24th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning.
[URL]
Yin, P., Forbus, K., Usher, J., Sageman, B., & Jee, B. D. (2010). Sketch Worksheets: A Sketch-based Educational Software System. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (IAAI-10) (pp. 1871-1876): AAAI Press.
[URL]

Z

Zacks, J. M. (2008). Neuroimaging studies of mental rotation: A meta-analysis and review. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(1), 1–19.
[DOI]
Zacks, J. M. & Michelon, P. (2005). Transformations of visuospatial images. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4(2), 96-118.
[DOI]
Zacks, J. M., Mires, J., Tversky, B., & Hazeltine, E. (2002). Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(4), 315-322.
[DOI]
Zacks, J. M. & Tversky, B. (2005). Multiple systems for spatial imagery: Transformations of objects and bodies. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(4), 271-306.
[DOI]
Zen, E. -A. (2001). What is deep time and why should anyone care? Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(1), 5-9.
Zosh, J. M. & Feigenson, L. (2009). Beyond 'what' and 'how many': Capacity, complexity, and resolution of infants' object representations. In B. M. Hood & L. Santos (Eds.), The Origins of Object Knowledge (pp. 25-51). New York: Oxford University Press.
Zur, O. (2005, April). Analogical reasoning as a learning mechanism in the domain of number. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development